Re: RFR 8039898: sunpkcs11-solaris.cfg should be in solaris specific directory

2014-09-11 Thread Erik Joelsson
Change looks good to me. /Erik On 2014-09-10 18:28, Valerie Peng wrote: Could someone please review this build related change for moving sunpkcs11-solaris.cfg file to the pkcs11 module? Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~valeriep/8039898/webrev.00/ Thanks, Valerie

Re: RFR 8039898: sunpkcs11-solaris.cfg should be in solaris specific directory

2014-09-11 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2014-09-10 18:28, Valerie Peng wrote: Could someone please review this build related change for moving sunpkcs11-solaris.cfg file to the pkcs11 module? Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~valeriep/8039898/webrev.00/ Looks good. However, I'll give the same feedback to you as I just

Re: RFR 8039898: sunpkcs11-solaris.cfg should be in solaris specific directory

2014-09-11 Thread Alan Bateman
On 11/09/2014 10:38, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2014-09-10 18:28, Valerie Peng wrote: Could someone please review this build related change for moving sunpkcs11-solaris.cfg file to the pkcs11 module? Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~valeriep/8039898/webrev.00/ Looks good. However,

Re: RFR 8039898: sunpkcs11-solaris.cfg should be in solaris specific directory

2014-09-11 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2014-09-11 11:51, Alan Bateman wrote: On 11/09/2014 10:38, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: The webrev shows the file as being moved outside the control of mercurial. That is, if you do hg mv to move the file, the history of the file will be kept intact. Otherwise it will look like a new file in

Kerberos Enc Type Expectations for delegated credential within AP_REQ message.

2014-09-11 Thread Darran Lofthouse
Hello there, I am currently attempting to get to the bottom of some interoperability issues regarding the handling of Kerberos AP_REQ messages that contain a delegated credential. Before I start raising bug reports I wanted to pass it through you guys first in case there is a strong

Re: RFR 8039898: sunpkcs11-solaris.cfg should be in solaris specific directory

2014-09-11 Thread Valerie Peng
Thanks all for the review and tips on webrev. I have re-generated the webrev following all the tips... Thanks again, Valerie On 9/11/2014 3:42 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2014-09-11 11:51, Alan Bateman wrote: On 11/09/2014 10:38, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: The webrev shows the file as

Re: Review request for CR 8049039 Need new tests for sun.securiy.x509 classes

2014-09-11 Thread raghu k.nair
Hi Jason, I have removed those lines from copyright headers. Here is the updated webrev. http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rhalade/8049039/webrev.04/ Thanks, Raghu Nair On 9/6/2014 1:58 AM, Jason Uh wrote: Hi Raghu, Formatting looks good, but one last thing about the copyright headers. I

Re: [9] RFR: 8047223: Add algorithm parameter to EncodedKeySpec class and its two subclasses

2014-09-11 Thread Sean Mullan
On line 83 of EncodedKeySpec, call algorithm.isEmpty() instead. Looks good otherwise. --Sean On 09/10/2014 07:14 PM, Jason Uh wrote: Please review this change, which adds a constructor taking an algorithm name parameter to EncodedKeySpec and its subclasses. This allows the algorithm name to be