On 29/04/2015 00:53, Joseph D. Darcy wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to get this changeset, or something close to it, pushed soon
so we can start taking advantage of better failure triaging.
Any further concerns?
I should have been clearer, I don't have any issues with the proposed
patch. I was mos
I had a quick read of the changes. All about doc cleanup, no behavior
changes. I did not check every line of the update. It's OK to me if
the update can pass a javadoc check.
Thanks,
Xuelei
On 4/24/2015 12:22 AM, alexander stepanov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could you please review the following fix
On 4/28/2015 10:57 PM, Daniel Jones wrote:
Hi (is it Max or Weijun? I don't want to be rude!)
Either is OK.
I've read through the code changes and static analysis with my eyes
suggests the change looks good. The client is not in the habit of
building OpenJDK regularly, but there's no reaso
Looks fine to me.
Thanks,
Xuelei
On 4/29/2015 8:44 AM, joe darcy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After additional testing, a few more security libs test have been
> observed to intermittently fail. Please review the patch below to address
>
> JDK-8078880: Mark a few more intermittently failuring securi
Hello,
After additional testing, a few more security libs test have been
observed to intermittently fail. Please review the patch below to address
JDK-8078880: Mark a few more intermittently failuring security-libs
tests
Thanks,
-Joe
diff -r b9f8eb8938f4 test/sun/security/mscapi/SignU
Hello,
I'd like to get this changeset, or something close to it, pushed soon so
we can start taking advantage of better failure triaging.
Any further concerns?
Thanks,
-Joe
On 4/24/2015 11:04 AM, joe darcy wrote:
On 4/23/2015 10:58 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 24/04/2015 02:54, Joseph D. Da
Sean,
Thanks for the review!
Webrev has been updated at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~valeriep/8038084/webrev.01/
Can you please review the CCC as well? It's http://ccc.us.oracle.com/8038084
Thanks again,
Valerie
On 4/27/2015 7:11 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
Hi Valerie,
Looks good, just a couple o
Hi (is it Max or Weijun? I don't want to be rude!)
I've read through the code changes and static analysis with my eyes
suggests the change looks good. The client is not in the habit of building
OpenJDK regularly, but there's no reason we can't give it a go.
I had a look on http://hg.openjdk.java.
Hi Weijun,
Thanks for your help. Sorry it's taken me a while to reply, I was give
other priorities over looking into this issue.
Your suggested workaround does indeed work. I've switched elements of the
byte array around with a debugger connected to the app, and that solves the
problem. Thankfull
On 4/28/2015 6:14 PM, Daniel Jones wrote:
I noticed in the bug report Internet Explorer is mentioned. We see the
same behaviour with IE, Firefox and Chrome.
Thanks. I've mentioned that in the comment.
BTW, are you able to build jdk yourself? If so, can you try out the fix?
http://cr.openj
10 matches
Mail list logo
