Yeah, many ways to generate bytes. It's generally ok to just re-use the
same input for various test scenarios in the same test class.
As far as I am concerned, the benefit of get data in one line doesn't
quite justify the extra dependency.
The updated webrev looks fine.
Valerie
On 7/20/2015
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8132130/webrev.00/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8132130
Just some docs cleanup (fix invalid tags, parameter names, remove
obsolete tags)
Thanks,
Alexander
ok.
Xuelei
On 7/22/2015 2:49 PM, Rajan Halade wrote:
> Please help me with your review for this one line fix to remove
> intermittent keyword. The test is pretty stable now.
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130031
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rhalade/8130031/webrev.00/
