On Saturday, 26 September 2015, Sean Mullan wrote:
> JDK-806769 doesn't exist, can you double-check what issue you think caused
> this? Looks like you are missing a digit.
>
>
Hi Sean, hmm I don't know how I managed that ... the complete issue id is
JDK-8067695.
>
> On 9/24/15 10:46 PM, David
It is obvious, but I thought I might mention it: it does absolutely not help
the user if a server refuses to negotiate a "MAY not use" cipher only to
fallback to http/1.1 with exactly that cipher. I can see the motivation for
deprecating those ciphers in modern servers (although I am note sure w
