> On Jan 13, 2017, at 7:30 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
>
> On 1/12/17 3:53 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
>>
>>> On Jan 11, 2017, at 5:34 AM, Adam Petcher
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Please review the following bug fix:
>>>
>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~apetcher/8168075/webrev.00/
>>>
>>> This fixes a bug in w
On 1/13/2017 10:30 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
On 1/12/17 3:53 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On Jan 11, 2017, at 5:34 AM, Adam Petcher
wrote:
Please review the following bug fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~apetcher/8168075/webrev.00/
This fixes a bug in which a permission check would try to load
res
On 1/12/17 3:53 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On Jan 11, 2017, at 5:34 AM, Adam Petcher
wrote:
Please review the following bug fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~apetcher/8168075/webrev.00/
This fixes a bug in which a permission check would try to load
resources while the system class loader is bein
On 1/13/17 4:09 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
This class has a method called verifyTimestamp() but it's actually about
the validity period fields in a certificate. I found it quite misleading
because whenever I see timestamp I think of TSA and RFC 3161.
Are you OK with changing all occurrences of "time
Hi Christoph,
thanks for looking at this!
Extracting methodName was part cleanup, part meant to
outline some rarely executed error handling code, which
can help a JIT focus on the critical path.
I'd prefer not to micro-optimize argumentTypesToString
(and would likely look at other things than S
Looks ok, but is this for JDK 9? If so, we shouldn't be fixing P4 bugs
now since we are in Rampdown Phase 1.
--Sean
On 1/13/17 6:51 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Please review this code change:
diff --git
a/src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/tools/keytool/Main.java
b/src/java.base/share/classe
Please review this code change:
diff --git
a/src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/tools/keytool/Main.java
b/src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/tools/keytool/Main.java
--- a/src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/tools/keytool/Main.java
+++ b/src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security
This class has a method called verifyTimestamp() but it's actually about
the validity period fields in a certificate. I found it quite misleading
because whenever I see timestamp I think of TSA and RFC 3161.
Are you OK with changing all occurrences of "timestamp" to "validity"?
This includes t