Good, and I can push my current changeset now.
Thanks
Max
On 03/22/2017 11:48 AM, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
On 3/21/2017 5:53 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
On 03/21/2017 11:13 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Maybe I can report this to MIT
krb5 and ask if they are afraid of it.
See http://mailman.mit.edu/piperm
On 3/21/2017 5:53 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
On 03/21/2017 11:13 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Maybe I can report this to MIT
krb5 and ask if they are afraid of it.
See http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/krbdev/2017-March/012744.html.
Do you suggest we exclude files starting with a dot now? Or we wait
On 03/21/2017 11:13 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Maybe I can report this to MIT
krb5 and ask if they are afraid of it.
See http://mailman.mit.edu/pipermail/krbdev/2017-March/012744.html.
Do you suggest we exclude files starting with a dot now? Or we wait
until MIT krb5 implements it first?
Than
Looks good.
Thanks,
Sean
On 3/20/17 5:02 PM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
Hi Sean,
I updated the webrev with your recent change. One you ok this, I'll
request approval for backport.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ascarpino/8176536/webrev.01/
thanks
Tony
On 03/17/2017 01:25 PM, Anthony Scarpino w
On 03/21/2017 11:03 PM, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
Honestly, I can't. I could see a sysadmin maybe moving a file like
foo.conf maybe to .foo.conf in order to "hide" it, but that wouldn't do
much now (it will still be processed) and now you have a situation where
the admin has a file being processed th
Hi Max,
On 3/20/2017 7:18 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
On 03/19/2017 11:41 PM, Jamil Nimeh wrote:
Hi Max,
Do you know if the MIT krb5 code accepts any filename with the .conf
extension? So filenames with spaces and periods with a .conf suffix are
fine? I just wanted to make sure because your tes
The change looks good.
Thanks
Max
On 03/21/2017 06:44 PM, Sergei Kovalev wrote:
Hi team,
Please review below small fix for security tests.
BugID: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177324
Review: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~skovalev/8177324/webrev.00
Issue: missed dependency declarati
Hi team,
Please review below small fix for security tests.
BugID: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8177324
Review: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~skovalev/8177324/webrev.00
Issue: missed dependency declaration in some security tests.
--
With best regards,
Sergei
