Hello!
An auxiliary class EqualByteArray implements hashCode() in a way that
small changes to the content do not change the hash value.
It is proposed to reuse Arrays.hashCode(byte[]) for the hash code
calculations.
Also, the private int hash is made non-volatile, as it removes accessing
t
Hi Siba
Change looks fine. I have no other comments.
Thanks
Max
> On Aug 23, 2017, at 8:30 PM, Sibabrata Sahoo
> wrote:
>
> Hi Max,
>
> Please find the updated webrev:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssahoo/8183310/webrev.02/
>
> The setup will be called only once irrespective number of @run
Hi Max,
Please find the updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssahoo/8183310/webrev.02/
The setup will be called only once irrespective number of @run available inside
the Test file.
Thanks,
Siba
-Original Message-
From: Weijun Wang
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 3:04 PM
To:
Then maybe you can also make setup() a separate @run.
--Max
> On Aug 23, 2017, at 4:17 PM, Sibabrata Sahoo
> wrote:
>
> Hi Max,
>
> I have splitted the @run to convert each run to consume minimum time to avoid
> any timeout for rare cases.
>
> Thanks,
> Siba
>
> -Original Message-
Hi Max,
I have splitted the @run to convert each run to consume minimum time to avoid
any timeout for rare cases.
Thanks,
Siba
-Original Message-
From: Weijun Wang
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 1:43 PM
To: Sibabrata Sahoo
Cc: Valerie Peng; [email protected]
Subject: Re:
Is there any reason why service being "true" and "false" are in 2 @run? This
means setup() will run twice.
--Max
> On Aug 22, 2017, at 9:36 PM, Sibabrata Sahoo
> wrote:
>
> Hi Max,
>
> Please find the updated webrev addressing all comments in applicable test
> files.
>
> Webrev: http://cr.
