> On Oct 18, 2018, at 10:34 AM, Weijun Wang wrote:
>
> Please review the code change and CSR for
>
> JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8212003
>
> at
>
> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8212003/webrev.00/
> CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8212111
Please review the code change and CSR for
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8212003
at
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8212003/webrev.00/
CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8212111
When -keyalg is not provided for -genkeypair or -genseckey, keytool wi
Looks fine to me.
Thanks
Max
> On Oct 18, 2018, at 2:03 AM, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> In the function Java_sun_security_mscapi_PRNG_generateSeed() a native memory
> is allocated, and then its content is copied into a freshly allocated Java
> array. The native memory allocation ca
On 10/17/2018 4:45 PM, Adam Petcher wrote:
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~apetcher/8205476/webrev.00/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205476
CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8212051
Please review the following change for a conformance bug in the ECDH
service. Th
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~apetcher/8205476/webrev.00/
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205476
CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8212051
Please review the following change for a conformance bug in the ECDH
service. The KeyAgreement is supposed to reset itself a
Hello!
In the function Java_sun_security_mscapi_PRNG_generateSeed() a native
memory is allocated, and then its content is copied into a freshly
allocated Java array. The native memory allocation can be avoided,
which also makes the code shorter.
Would you please help review the fix?
BUGURL
You can create a PKCS10 file, we have sun.security.pkcs.PKCS10.
> On Oct 17, 2018, at 1:36 AM, Will Sargent wrote:
>
> Also, I wasn't able to figure out how to create CertificateRequest at all.
> This is kind of a pain when dealing with Vault PKI or Lemur.
Looks fine to me.
Regards,
Sean.
On 17/10/18 08:03, [email protected] wrote:
Hi,
test/jdk/lib/security doesn't exist, so this directory could be
removed from jdk_security3
diff -r f54dcfc5a5f8 test/jdk/TEST.groups
--- a/test/jdk/TEST.groupsFri Oct 05 15:12:37 2018 -0700
+++ b/test/jdk
I'd like to re-boot this review. I've been working with Erik off thread
who's been helping with code and test design.
Some of the main changes worthy of highlighting :
* Separate out the tests for JFR and Logger events
* Rename some events
* Normalize the data view for X509ValidationEvent (old
Hi,
test/jdk/lib/security doesn't exist, so this directory could be removed
from jdk_security3
diff -r f54dcfc5a5f8 test/jdk/TEST.groups
--- a/test/jdk/TEST.groups Fri Oct 05 15:12:37 2018 -0700
+++ b/test/jdk/TEST.groups Wed Oct 17 15:01:36 2018 +0800
@@ -218,8 +218,7 @@
-sun/securi
10 matches
Mail list logo