HI Rob,
thanks for the update! Seems it was accepted for 11.0.2 ...
So I don't need to take action.
Best regards,
Goetz.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob McKenna
> Sent: Mittwoch, 21. November 2018 17:35
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz
> Cc: security-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: dow
Hi Max,
Here are some comments:
- line 39, add PSS here as well.
- line 97, CSignature ctr, better to initialize all fields
- line 109, has key algorithm been checked by JCA already? If not, it
should be checked here. Same goes for line 414, and 560
- with the class renaming, I think it's clea
Hi,
Can someone help reviewing this fix?
Besides changing the Provider class to use ConcurrentHashMap in order to
reduce the lock contention on Provider.getService() calls, I also
changed the security providers in java.base module to register through
putService(...) calls. Performance is manu
On 11/15/18 10:42 AM, Gidon Gershinsky wrote:
> Having the decryption optimized in the HotSpot engine would be ideal.
I agree with you. I did a few experiments, and it can take a very
long time for C2 compilation to kick in, especially because GCM is
glacially slow until the intrinsics are used.
p.s I've updated the testcase to test the IOException message for
presence of "DNSName". Webrev updated in place.
Regards,
Sean.
On 21/11/18 15:42, Seán Coffey wrote:
Thanks for the comments Bernd. Comments inline..
On 16/11/18 21:27, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
Hello Sean,
I was only looking a
..11.0.3-oracle represents the Oracle JDK release scheduled for April 2019
as you correctly note.
-Rob
On 21/11/18 16:13, Rob McKenna wrote:
> Hi Goetz,
>
> The CPUXX_YY-critical-request indicates that the engineer is attempting
> to get this fix approved for inclusion in 11.0.2. This may or
Hi Goetz,
The CPUXX_YY-critical-request indicates that the engineer is attempting
to get this fix approved for inclusion in 11.0.2. This may or may not
be successful (though the SQE-OK label indicates it has overcome one of
the bigger hurdles) If approval is secured the fix will be pushed to the
s
Thanks for the comments Bernd. Comments inline..
On 16/11/18 21:27, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
Hello Sean,
I was only looking at the inspected DNSName class, it still has some
variations (but start now with DNSNames which is good already):
76 throw new IOException("DNSName must not be null or
Please take a review at
https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8214179/webrev.00/
Before this change, `keytool -genkeypair -keyalg EC -groupname brainpoolP256r1`
shows
Generating -1 bit EC key pair and self-signed certificate...
With this change, the message becomes
Generating brainpoolP25
Hi,
thanks for working on this issue!
But I'm not clear what it means that you did.
Do I understand correctly that tag CPU19_01-critical-SQE-OK
in 8209965 means it will be fixed in the January 2019 release
of jdk11?
I.e., the change will show up on January 15th 2019 in the
open repository jdk-
10 matches
Mail list logo
