Re: RFR 8226543 : Reduce GC pressure during message digest calculations in password-based encryption

2019-06-25 Thread Ivan Gerasimov
Thank you Sean for review! On 6/25/19 10:55 AM, Sean Mullan wrote: Hi Ivan, This fix looks good. --Sean On 6/20/19 10:22 PM, Ivan Gerasimov wrote: Hello! In PBES1Core.deriveCipherKey() there are loops that look like following: for (int i = 0; i < iCount; i++) {

Is Digicert's continued use of the "Distrusted" certificates for code signing still valid?

2019-06-25 Thread Bert Eisen
Hello, I’m trying to understand why Digicert are still issuing signing certificates from the distrusted Symantec root CAs and as a consequence if the java code signing is still meaningful?  I know for sure that they are still issing certificates from the distrusted "thawte Primary Root CA - G3"

Re: RFR 8226543 : Reduce GC pressure during message digest calculations in password-based encryption

2019-06-25 Thread Sean Mullan
Hi Ivan, This fix looks good. --Sean On 6/20/19 10:22 PM, Ivan Gerasimov wrote: Hello! In PBES1Core.deriveCipherKey() there are loops that look like following:     for (int i = 0; i < iCount; i++) {     md.update(toBeHashed);     toBeHashed = md.digest(); /

Is Digicert's continued use of the "Distrusted" certificates for code signing still valid?

2019-06-25 Thread Bert Eisen
Hello, I’m trying to understand why Digicert are still issuing signing certificates from the distrusted Symantec root certificates and as a consequence if the java code signing is still meaningful? I know for sure that they are still issing certificates from the distrusted "thawte Primary Root CA