Hi Peter,
For further understanding, may I know more details about the test code?
Thanks,
Xuelei
> On May 11, 2021, at 10:31 PM, Peter Firmstone
> wrote:
>
> Just ran some performance stress tests to compare performance between Java 8
> and Java 14 with SecurityManager enabled and using
Just ran some performance stress tests to compare performance between
Java 8 and Java 14 with SecurityManager enabled and using TLSv1.3 secure
communications.
On Java 8, AccessController.getStackAccessControlContext[native]() is
7,741ms of process CPU consumption.
On Java 11,
There’s an extra blank line inserted at the end of java.security. Otherwise
lgtm.
I’m fine with using KnownOIDs.java from tip. One might object that now it’s in
a different location and must be kept sync’ed with tip, but I don’t agree
because the backported version must be updated only when a
On Thu, 6 May 2021 16:49:33 GMT, Hai-May Chao wrote:
> Please review the change to jarsigner so it uses certpath security property
> in order to properly display the weakness of the certificate algorithms.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 995e9560
Author:Hai-May Chao
On Fri, 7 May 2021 14:10:14 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> Hai-May Chao has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Test with new java.security file
>
> Marked as reviewed by weijun (Reviewer).
@wangweij @seanjmullan Thanks for the
On Thu, 6 May 2021 20:57:13 GMT, Hai-May Chao wrote:
>> Please review the change to jarsigner so it uses certpath security property
>> in order to properly display the weakness of the certificate algorithms.
>
> Hai-May Chao has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>
> test sun/security/ssl/SSLSocketImpl/CloseSocket.java verifies the behavior
> when a server closes the socket connection during a handshake. The server was
> waiting a fixed 100ms before closing it, but there was no guarantee that the
> client started the handshake before or during that time
On Mon, 10 May 2021 15:40:49 GMT, Rajan Halade wrote:
>> OK
>
> Can you please add this as a comment in a test file for clientThread
> variable? I am sure we will have (failed) try to convert it to CountDownLatch
> in future.
@rhalade sure comment included
-
PR:
