> After JDK-8265518(#3615), it's possible to replace all variants of checkIndex
> by Objects.checkIndex/Objects.checkFromToIndex/Objects.checkFromIndexSize in
> the whole JDK codebase.
Yi Yang has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional commits
since the last revision:
- re
> After JDK-8265518(#3615), it's possible to replace all variants of checkIndex
> by Objects.checkIndex/Objects.checkFromToIndex/Objects.checkFromIndexSize in
> the whole JDK codebase.
Yi Yang has updated the pull request incrementally with four additional commits
since the last revision:
- r
On Tue, 6 Jul 2021 19:06:43 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote:
>> Yi Yang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> tests rely on IOOBE exception message
>
> test/jdk/java/lang/StringBuffer/Exceptions.java line 73:
>
>> 71: n
> Hi,
>
> I need a review of these new jmh tests that run AES/GCM encryption and
> decryption using byte[], heap bytebuffers, and direct bytebuffers as input
> and output buffers for single and multi-part testing.
>
> thanks
>
> Tony
Anthony Scarpino has updated the pull request incrementall
On Fri, 2 Jul 2021 23:30:17 GMT, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I need a review of these new jmh tests that run AES/GCM encryption and
>> decryption using byte[], heap bytebuffers, and direct bytebuffers as input
>> and output buffers for single and multi-part testing.
>>
>> thanks
>>
On Wed, 23 Jun 2021 03:54:55 GMT, Yi Yang wrote:
>> After JDK-8265518(#3615), it's possible to replace all variants of
>> checkIndex by
>> Objects.checkIndex/Objects.checkFromToIndex/Objects.checkFromIndexSize in
>> the whole JDK codebase.
>
> Yi Yang has updated the pull request incrementally
On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 06:29:58 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
>> @dholmes-ora @AlanBateman @PaulSandoz do you have any comments on the latest
>> version? Thanks.
>
> @kelthuzadx I did not see any response to my query about the change in
> initialization (not load) order. I also remain concerned about i
On Tue, 6 Jul 2021 15:40:09 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> Anthony Scarpino has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> merge AESGCMByteArray with existing AESGCMBench
>
> test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/javax/crypto/full/AESGCMByteBuffer.j
On Tue, 6 Jul 2021 15:38:20 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> Anthony Scarpino has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> merge AESGCMByteArray with existing AESGCMBench
>
> test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/javax/crypto/full/AESGCMBench.java l
On Tue, 6 Jul 2021 15:41:27 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> Anthony Scarpino has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> merge AESGCMByteArray with existing AESGCMBench
>
> test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/javax/crypto/full/AESGCMBench.java l
On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 13:20:54 GMT, Alexey Bakhtin wrote:
> Please review the fix for JDK-8268965.
>
> The new jtreg test is added for the described issue.
> sun/security/ssl and javax/net/ssl tests are passed
Hi Alexey,
Thank you for the details thread stacks.
The basic idea of the fix looks g
On Fri, 2 Jul 2021 23:30:17 GMT, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I need a review of these new jmh tests that run AES/GCM encryption and
>> decryption using byte[], heap bytebuffers, and direct bytebuffers as input
>> and output buffers for single and multi-part testing.
>>
>> thanks
>>
On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 13:20:54 GMT, Alexey Bakhtin wrote:
> Please review the fix for JDK-8268965.
>
> The new jtreg test is added for the described issue.
> sun/security/ssl and javax/net/ssl tests are passed
Hi Xuelei,
Thank you for your interest in this issue.
In this particular test case, a s
13 matches
Mail list logo
