Withdrawn: 8273101: Eliminate the usage of threadgroup sandboxing in the java.util.logging

2022-01-06 Thread duke
On Wed, 1 Sep 2021 06:31:16 GMT, Sergey Bylokhov wrote: > At the time Java supported applets and webstart, a special mechanism for > launching various applications in one JVM was used to reduce memory usage and > each application was isolated from each other. > > This isolation was

Re: RFR: 8255739: x509Certificate returns � for invalid subjectAlternativeNames

2022-01-06 Thread Weijun Wang
On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 11:59:18 GMT, Masanori Yano wrote: > Could you please review the JDK-8255739 bug fix? > > I think sun.security.x509.SubjectAlternativeNameExtension() should throw an > exception for incorrect SubjectAlternativeNames instead of returning the > substituted characters, which

Integrated: 8279520: SPNEGO has not passed channel binding info into the underlying mechanism

2022-01-06 Thread Weijun Wang
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 16:25:27 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote: > 8279520: SPNEGO has not passed channel binding info into the underlying > mechanism This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: 8d0f385f Author:Weijun Wang URL:

Re: RFR: 8279520: SPNEGO has not passed channel binding info into the underlying mechanism

2022-01-06 Thread Valerie Peng
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 16:25:27 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote: > 8279520: SPNEGO has not passed channel binding info into the underlying > mechanism Looks good. Thanks. - Marked as reviewed by valeriep (Reviewer). PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6969

Re: RFR: 8279520: SPNEGO has not passed channel binding info into the underlying mechanism

2022-01-06 Thread Sean Mullan
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 16:25:27 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote: > 8279520: SPNEGO has not passed channel binding info into the underlying > mechanism Marked as reviewed by mullan (Reviewer). src/java.security.jgss/share/classes/sun/security/jgss/spnego/SpNegoContext.java line 2: > 1: /* > 2: *

Re: RFR: 8279520: SPNEGO has not passed channel binding info into the underlying mechanism

2022-01-06 Thread Valerie Peng
On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 16:25:27 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote: > 8279520: SPNEGO has not passed channel binding info into the underlying > mechanism I will take a look. - PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6969

Re: RFR: 8255739: x509Certificate returns � for invalid subjectAlternativeNames

2022-01-06 Thread Sean Mullan
On Thu, 23 Dec 2021 11:59:18 GMT, Masanori Yano wrote: > Could you please review the JDK-8255739 bug fix? > > I think sun.security.x509.SubjectAlternativeNameExtension() should throw an > exception for incorrect SubjectAlternativeNames instead of returning the > substituted characters, which