On Tue, 25 Jan 2022 00:13:32 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
> A hostname in an URL ending with a dot is valid (See RFC 1034). However, it
> is not a valid SNI hostname. The ending dot should be ignored while checking
> the hostname with SNI or the name in a X.509 certificate.
>
> The update
On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 01:19:12 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> Xue-Lei Andrew Fan has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Add regression test with customized hosts
>
> test/jdk/javax/net/ssl/ServerName/EndingDotHostname.java line 8:
>
>
> A hostname in an URL ending with a dot is valid (See RFC 1034). However, it
> is not a valid SNI hostname. The ending dot should be ignored while checking
> the hostname with SNI or the name in a X.509 certificate.
>
> The update could be verified with jshell.
> $ $JDK_HOME/bin/jshell
> jshe
On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 03:42:33 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
>> A hostname in an URL ending with a dot is valid (See RFC 1034). However, it
>> is not a valid SNI hostname. The ending dot should be ignored while
>> checking the hostname with SNI or the name in a X.509 certificate.
>>
>> The upd
On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 18:58:07 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
>> A hostname in an URL ending with a dot is valid (See RFC 1034). However, it
>> is not a valid SNI hostname. The ending dot should be ignored while
>> checking the hostname with SNI or the name in a X.509 certificate.
>>
>> The up
On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 18:58:07 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
>> A hostname in an URL ending with a dot is valid (See RFC 1034). However, it
>> is not a valid SNI hostname. The ending dot should be ignored while
>> checking the hostname with SNI or the name in a X.509 certificate.
>>
>> The up
On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 21:35:59 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
> Reduce noise in test output by adding the @SuppressWarnings("removal")
> annotation (which has already been widely applied).
Marked as reviewed by sspitsyn (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7328
On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 22:13:07 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
> On a related issue, have you given any thought as to what the behavior should
> be if a 3rd-party JSSE provider is not updated to support these new methods?
> I don't know of a good way to address that since the API is not part of the
> pro
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 22:06:21 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
> This update is to support signature schemes customization for individual
> (D)TLS connection. Please review the CSR as well:
> CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8280495
> RFE: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8280
On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 19:12:56 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
>> This update is to support signature schemes customization for individual
>> (D)TLS connection. Please review the CSR as well:
>> CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8280495
>> RFE: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8
On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 21:35:59 GMT, Kevin Walls wrote:
> Reduce noise in test output by adding the @SuppressWarnings("removal")
> annotation (which has already been widely applied).
Marked as reviewed by rriggs (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7328
On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 19:12:56 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
>> This update is to support signature schemes customization for individual
>> (D)TLS connection. Please review the CSR as well:
>> CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8280495
>> RFE: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8
On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 19:12:56 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
>> This update is to support signature schemes customization for individual
>> (D)TLS connection. Please review the CSR as well:
>> CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8280495
>> RFE: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8
Reduce noise in test output by adding the @SuppressWarnings("removal")
annotation (which has already been widely applied).
-
Commit messages:
- 8272777: Clean up remaining AccessController warnings in test library
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7328/files
Webrev: h
On Wed, 2 Feb 2022 14:45:21 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
> A few more comments on the API.
All good catches! Thank you very much. Updated the spec, CSR and impl.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7252
> This update is to support signature schemes customization for individual
> (D)TLS connection. Please review the CSR as well:
> CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8280495
> RFE: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8280494
Xue-Lei Andrew Fan has updated the pull request increment
On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 06:42:30 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
>> Ok. You should specify what the default value of the signature schemes
>> parameter is for this constructor as it does for the other parameters.
>
> Good catch. Updated.
Looks good.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/j
On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 06:47:00 GMT, Xue-Lei Andrew Fan wrote:
>> This update is to support signature schemes customization for individual
>> (D)TLS connection. Please review the CSR as well:
>> CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8280495
>> RFE: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8
18 matches
Mail list logo
