On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 09:46:06 GMT, Sibabrata Sahoo wrote:
> A Test updated to cover the getCodeSigners.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 0cb0ecf4
Author: Sibabrata Sahoo
URL:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/0cb0ecf4433f1054ba2f0fbdabee01323893e0fe
St
> A Test updated to cover the getCodeSigners.
Sibabrata Sahoo has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
commits since the last revision:
- 8209935: Test to cover CodeSource.getCodeSigners()
- 8209935: Test to cover CodeSource.getCodeSigners()
-
Chan
On Thu, 9 Jun 2022 21:12:26 GMT, Sean Mullan wrote:
>> Sibabrata Sahoo has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> 8209935: Test to cover CodeSource.getCodeSigners()
>
> test/jdk/java/security/Code
> A Test updated to cover the getCodeSigners.
Sibabrata Sahoo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
8209935: Test to cover CodeSource.getCodeSigners()
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8286/fi
> A Test updated to cover the getCodeSigners.
Sibabrata Sahoo has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a
merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes
brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains four additional
commits since the l
On Wed, 18 May 2022 16:19:40 GMT, Sibabrata Sahoo wrote:
> A new API to execute kinit.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: dbda0e2b
Author: Sibabrata Sahoo
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/dbda0e2bda5d8ba86f068684941a05387947d993
Stats: 12 li
A new API to execute kinit.
-
Commit messages:
- 8286969: Add a new test library API to execute kinit in SecurityTools.java
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8775/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk=8775=00
Issue:
> A Test updated to cover the getCodeSigners.
Sibabrata Sahoo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Update Implies.java
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8286/files
- new: ht
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 13:22:35 GMT, Sibabrata Sahoo wrote:
>> A Test updated to cover the getCodeSigners.
>
> Sibabrata Sahoo has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Update Implies.java
All comments addresse
A Test updated to cover the getCodeSigners.
-
Commit messages:
- Update Implies.java
- 8209935: Test to cover CodeSource.getCodeSigners()
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/8286/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk=8286=00
Issue:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 04:02:44 GMT, John Jiang wrote:
> JDK-8228396 turned stateless resumption on by default, but the JavaDoc was
> not modified accordingly.
> And a "{" is missing for @systemProperty
> jdk.tls.server.enableSessionTicketExtension.
Marked as reviewed by ssahoo (Committer).
> Added coverage to logout method.
Sibabrata Sahoo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Update AllPlatforms.java
Updated exception handling to ignore the case where the running platform
doesn't match the test case. In that c
On Thu, 24 Mar 2022 23:02:47 GMT, Rajan Halade wrote:
>> Sibabrata Sahoo has updated the pull request incrementally with two
>> additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Update AllPlatforms.java
>> - Update AllPlatforms.java
>
> t
> Added coverage to logout method.
Sibabrata Sahoo has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
commits since the last revision:
- Update AllPlatforms.java
- Update AllPlatforms.java
-
Changes:
- all: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7940/files
-
Added coverage to logout method.
-
Commit messages:
- 8281717: Cover logout method for several LoginModule
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/7940/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk=7940=00
Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8281717
On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 15:03:31 GMT, Sibabrata Sahoo wrote:
> Domain value for system property jdk.https.negotiate.cbt is case-insensitive
> now. Included Test has been updated to address the change.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 86015e15
Author:Sibabrata Saho
On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 19:46:09 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> Sibabrata Sahoo has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Update HttpsCB.java
>
> src/java.base/share/clas
> Domain value for system property jdk.https.negotiate.cbt is case-insensitive
> now. Included Test has been updated to address the change.
Sibabrata Sahoo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
> Domain value for system property jdk.https.negotiate.cbt is case-insensitive
> now. Included Test has been updated to address the change.
Sibabrata Sahoo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Update HttpsC
Domain value for system property jdk.https.negotiate.cbt is case-insensitive
now. Included Test has been updated to address the change.
-
Commit messages:
- 8282293: Domain value for system property jdk.https.negotiate.cbt should be
case-insensitive
Changes:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 06:26:58 GMT, Sibabrata Sahoo wrote:
> This Test gets timeout during low cpu availability. It is modified to support
> extended timeout period during JTREG execution.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: f22d157e
Author:Sibabrata Saho
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 06:14:49 GMT, Sibabrata Sahoo wrote:
>> This Test gets timeout during low cpu availability. It is modified to
>> support extended timeout period during JTREG execution.
>
> Sibabrata Sahoo has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> additional
> This Test gets timeout during low cpu availability. It is modified to support
> extended timeout period during JTREG execution.
Sibabrata Sahoo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
8277353: java/security/Message
On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 15:12:16 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Can you lower the `threadsFactor` or `duration`? Or set an upper limit for
> `nTasks`?
I can reduce the threadFactor and duration to close to half(threadsFactor=2 and
duration=2 Or hardcode nTasks=20) and i think there still will be enough
This Test gets timeout during low cpu availability. It is modified to support
extended timeout period during JTREG execution.
-
Commit messages:
- 8277353: java/security/MessageDigest/ThreadSafetyTest.java test times out
- 8277353: java/security/MessageDigest/ThreadSafetyTest.java
On Wed, 14 Jul 2021 17:15:14 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote:
>> Sibabrata Sahoo has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Create ReinitDigest.java
>>
>> Provider name verification requir
On Wed, 14 Jul 2021 10:06:59 GMT, Sibabrata Sahoo wrote:
> Few more Test cases added to verify MessageDigest instance generated through
> different providers.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: a32d2eef
Author:Sibabrata Sahoo
URL:
https://git.openjdk.ja
> Few more Test cases added to verify MessageDigest instance generated through
> different providers.
Sibabrata Sahoo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since the last revision:
Create ReinitDigest.java
Provider name verification re
Few more Test cases added to verify MessageDigest instance generated through
different providers.
-
Commit messages:
- 8269276: Additional tests for MessageDigest with different providers
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk17/pull/250/files
Webrev:
On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 13:24:17 GMT, Abdul Kolarkunnu
wrote:
>> ParamsTest is an interop test between keytool <-> openssl. There are some
>> manual steps listed in jdk/sun/security/pkcs12/params/README to perform
>> after the execution of jtreg execution. So this test is to perform that
>>
On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 05:43:15 GMT, Abdul Kolarkunnu
wrote:
>> ParamsTest is an interop test between keytool <-> openssl. There are some
>> manual steps listed in jdk/sun/security/pkcs12/params/README to perform
>> after the execution of jtreg execution. So this test is to perform that
>>
On Thu, 27 May 2021 08:52:20 GMT, Sibabrata Sahoo wrote:
> This change converts JTREG shell Test scripts to Java equivalent.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 7f55dc15
Author: Sibabrata Sahoo
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/com
On Tue, 18 May 2021 13:19:53 GMT, Fernando Guallini
wrote:
> Refactor the following shell tests to Java:
> - security/pkcs11/KeyStore/Basic.sh
> - security/pkcs11/KeyStore/ClientAuth.sh
> - security/pkcs11/KeyStore/SecretKeysBasic.sh
> - security/pkcs11/Provider/ConfigQuotedString.sh
> -
This change converts JTREG shell Test scripts to Java equivalent.
-
Commit messages:
- 8179880: Refactor javax/security shell tests to plain java tests
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4220/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk=4220=00
Issue:
On Wed, 5 May 2021 10:00:22 GMT, Sibabrata Sahoo wrote:
> This change is to remove the shell Test and convert to it's java equivalent.
> That is the reason the shell Tests are deleted and the equivalent Java
> implementation provided.
> The purpose of the Test TestEx
This change is to remove the shell Test and convert to it's java equivalent.
That is the reason the shell Tests are deleted and the equivalent Java
implementation provided.
The purpose of the Test TestExemption.java is with limited crypto policy a JCE
provider can supplemented additional crypto
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 13:38:06 GMT, Sibabrata Sahoo wrote:
> This is a simple Test to add few additional API coverage for all java
> supported key types. The objective of this Test is to cover equals() and
> hashcode() methods for each key types.
This pull request has now been i
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 06:56:21 GMT, Sibabrata Sahoo wrote:
>> This is a simple Test to add few additional API coverage for all java
>> supported key types. The objective of this Test is to cover equals() and
>> hashcode() methods for each key types.
>
> Sibabrata Sa
> This is a simple Test to add few additional API coverage for all java
> supported key types. The objective of this Test is to cover equals() and
> hashcode() methods for each key types.
Sibabrata Sahoo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since
On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 00:16:59 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote:
>> Sibabrata Sahoo has updated the pull request incrementally with two
>> additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Update CompareKeys.java
>> - Update CompareKeys.java
>
> test/jdk/javax/
> This is a simple Test to add few additional API coverage for all java
> supported key types. The objective of this Test is to cover equals() and
> hashcode() methods for each key types.
Sibabrata Sahoo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since
> This is a simple Test to add few additional API coverage for all java
> supported key types. The objective of this Test is to cover equals() and
> hashcode() methods for each key types.
Sibabrata Sahoo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since
> This is a simple Test to add few additional API coverage for all java
> supported key types. The objective of this Test is to cover equals() and
> hashcode() methods for each key types.
Sibabrata Sahoo has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional
commits since
> This is a simple Test to add few additional API coverage for all java
> supported key types. The objective of this Test is to cover equals() and
> hashcode() methods for each key types.
Sibabrata Sahoo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 08:34:11 GMT, Sibabrata Sahoo wrote:
>> This is a simple Test to add few additional API coverage for all java
>> supported key types. The objective of this Test is to cover equals() and
>> hashcode() methods for each key types.
>
> Sibabrata Sa
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 13:38:06 GMT, Sibabrata Sahoo wrote:
> This is a simple Test to add few additional API coverage for all java
> supported key types. The objective of this Test is to cover equals() and
> hashcode() methods for each key types.
This pull request has been closed with
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 08:34:11 GMT, Sibabrata Sahoo wrote:
>> This is a simple Test to add few additional API coverage for all java
>> supported key types. The objective of this Test is to cover equals() and
>> hashcode() methods for each key types.
>
> Sibabrata Sa
> This is a simple Test to add few additional API coverage for all java
> supported key types. The objective of this Test is to cover equals() and
> hashcode() methods for each key types.
Sibabrata Sahoo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since
> This is a simple Test to add few additional API coverage for all java
> supported key types. The objective of this Test is to cover equals() and
> hashcode() methods for each key types.
Sibabrata Sahoo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:32:26 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote:
>> test/jdk/javax/crypto/KeyGenerator/CompareKeys.java line 73:
>>
>>> 71: && !Arrays.equals(origKey.getEncoded(),
>>> copyKey.getEncoded())
>>> 72: && origKey.hashCode() != copyKey.hashCode()) {
>>> 73:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:23:09 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote:
>> Sibabrata Sahoo has updated the pull request incrementally with one
>> additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Comment changed.
>>
>> Comment changed.
>
> test/jdk/javax/cry
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 03:58:33 GMT, Valerie Peng wrote:
>> Could someone (perhaps Jamil?) please help review this change? This enhances
>> SunPKCS11 provider with ChaCha20-Poly1305 cipher and ChaCha20 key generation
>> support. Majority of the regression tests are adapted from the existing ones
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 22:57:55 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> I'd like to move this tool to test/lib inside a proper named package.
>
> Weijun Wang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
> commit since the last revision:
>
> do not call internal method
Marked as reviewed
> This is a simple Test to add few additional API coverage for all java
> supported key types. The objective of this Test is to cover equals() and
> hashcode() methods for each key types.
Sibabrata Sahoo has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
commit since
This is a simple Test to add few additional API coverage for all java supported
key types. The objective of this Test is to cover equals() and hashcode()
methods for each key types.
-
Commit messages:
- 8185127: Add Tests to cover hashCode() method for java supported crypto key
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:45:34 GMT, Sibabrata Sahoo wrote:
> The Test getting timeout intermittently because the SO_TIMEOUT of 5 seconds
> set on sslServerSocket. This time interval could be inadequate when the
> machine is too busy. Also it looks setting SO_TIMEOUT is unnecessary
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:30:07 GMT, Sibabrata Sahoo wrote:
> The Test is updated to use positive integer as seed for SecureRandom.
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 5a51d709
Author: Sibabrata Sahoo
URL: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/5a51d709
Stats:
The Test getting timeout intermittently because the SO_TIMEOUT of 5 seconds set
on sslServerSocket. This time interval could be inadequate when the machine is
too busy. Also it looks setting SO_TIMEOUT is unnecessary here. So the
statement has been removed.
-
Commit messages:
-
The Test is updated to use positive integer as seed for SecureRandom.
-
Commit messages:
- 8247895: SHA1PRNGReseed.java is calling setSeed(0)
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/3114/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo=jdk=3114=00
Issue:
Hi Xuelei/Brad,
Please review the patch for,
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8224650
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssahoo/8224650/webrev.00/
This is a small Test inherited from "SSLSocketTemplate" and reuse most part of
it. The only difference is, it uses
Hi Xuelei,
Please review a minor fix for,
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8211787
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssahoo/8211787/webrev.00/
The original intention to "setSoTimeout()" is on serverSocket where the server
will fail with timeout if it exceed certain amount
To: Sibabrata Sahoo
Cc: Xue-Lei Fan ; security-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [11] RFR: 8208496: New Test to verify concurrent behavior for TLS.
Hi Siba,
Would it be better to check how many connections the server accepts?
In your case, the server must accept 50 (no more no less) connections;
otherwise
Hi Xuelei,
Please review the patch for,
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8208496
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssahoo/8208496/webrev.00/
This is a new Test which test concurrent behavior of TLS. It uses 50 client
thread to access a single server port concurrently
Hi,
Please review the change for the following patch,
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8206355
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssahoo/8206355/webrev.00/
It fixes SSLSessionImpl.getLocalPrincipal() implementation when client side
authentication is not enabled.
May I get the approval from serviceability-...@openjdk.java.net.
Thanks,
Siba
-Original Message-
From: Xuelei Fan
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 9:27 PM
To: Daniel Fuchs ; Sibabrata Sahoo
; jmx-...@openjdk.java.net;
security-dev@openjdk.java.net; serviceability-...@openjdk.java.net
Resending the email after subscribing to HYPERLINK
"mailto:jmx-...@openjdk.java.net"jmx-...@openjdk.java.net
Thanks,
Siba
From: Sibabrata Sahoo
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 8:40 PM
To: HYPERLINK "mailto:jmx-...@openjdk.java.net"jmx-...@openjdk.java.net;
HYPERLINK
Hi Daniel,
I am not a member of HYPERLINK
"mailto:jmx-...@openjdk.java.net"jmx-...@openjdk.java.net. So the review posted
is waiting for moderator's approval.
Thanks,
Siba
From: Sibabrata Sahoo
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 8:40 PM
To: jmx-...@openjdk.java.net; se
Hi,
Please review the patch for,
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205653
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssahoo/8205653/webrev.00/
Change:
The Test has been upgraded to address the following 2 cases,
Add protocol support for TLSv1.3. The change is done in the
added to have the flexibility to change the parameter(Cipher)
which are not in order(shuffled).
Thanks,
Siba
-Original Message-
From: Xuelei Fan
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 7:28 PM
To: Sibabrata Sahoo ; security-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [11] RFR: JDK-8205111: Develop new Test
Hi Xuelei,
Please review the patch for,
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8205111
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssahoo/8205111/webrev.00/
Change:
This Test file verifies all TLS protocols with the supported keytypes.
Thanks,
Siba
Sean Mullan
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 1:42 AM
To: Sibabrata Sahoo <sibabrata.sa...@oracle.com>; Adam Petcher
<adam.petc...@oracle.com>; security-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: RFR: 8200219: Develop new tests for using new elliptic curves:
curve25519 and curve448
On 4/9/18 10:
Hi Sean,
My comments In-lined..
Thanks,
Siba
-Original Message-
From: Sean Mullan
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2018 12:13 AM
To: Sibabrata Sahoo <sibabrata.sa...@oracle.com>; Adam Petcher
<adam.petc...@oracle.com>; security-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: RFR: 8200219:
ollowing 2 Test files inside
the same folder.
ReplayCacheExpunge.java
ReplayCachePrecise.java
Thanks,
Siba
-Original Message-
From: Weijun Wang
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 11:33 AM
To: Sibabrata Sahoo <sibabrata.sa...@oracle.com>
Cc: security-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [
I will remove the commented lines. I think, it should be fine, if I do not
submit the webrev again.
Thanks,
Siba
-Original Message-
From: Weijun Wang
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 9:07 PM
To: Sibabrata Sahoo <sibabrata.sa...@oracle.com>
Cc: security-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subje
Hi,
Please review the change for the following patch,
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8194486
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssahoo/8194486/webrev.00/
Description:
There are several failure occurred recently because the name service used by
these Tests were not
Hi Max,
I have splitted the @run to convert each run to consume minimum time to avoid
any timeout for rare cases.
Thanks,
Siba
-Original Message-
From: Weijun Wang
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 1:43 PM
To: Sibabrata Sahoo
Cc: Valerie Peng; security-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re
additional Test case for regular jars in modulepath and modular
jars in classpath, which verifies how the type get resolved.
Thanks,
Siba
-Original Message-
From: Weijun Wang
Sent: Wednesday, August 02, 2017 3:53 PM
To: Sibabrata Sahoo
Cc: Valerie Peng; security-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subjec
Hi,
This patch is pending for your review.
Thanks,
Siba
From: Sibabrata Sahoo
Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2017 4:00 PM
To: Weijun Wang; Valerie Peng; security-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: [10] RFR: JDK-8183310: java/security/modules/ModularTest.java should
clean up better
Hi
Hi,
Please review the patch for the following,
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8183310
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssahoo/8183310/webrev.00/
Change description:
The code has been changed significantly for cleaning up existing code and to
simplify it. During
Change looks fine to me. But I am not the reviewer yet.
Thanks,
Siba
-Original Message-
From: Weijun Wang
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 11:23 AM
To: Security Dev OpenJDK
Cc: Gustavo Galimberti; Sibabrata Sahoo
Subject: RFR 8181461: sun/security/krb5/auto/KdcPolicy.java fails
in this repository, in revision 16548
Regarding the following comment on " grant codeBase "file:./jars/*" ", we have
already discussed and we are fine here to not make any change.
Thanks,
Siba
-Original Message-
From: Sean Mullan
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 10:00 PM
To: S
rTest.java, the code comments has been removed from @summary
section. But it retains the same at line: 91-102.
Thanks,
Siba
-Original Message-
From: Sean Mullan
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 12:07 AM
To: Sibabrata Sahoo; Adam Petcher; security-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [9] RFR: 8168423:
Hi Adam/Sean,
This patch is waiting for your review.
Thanks,
Siba
From: Sibabrata Sahoo
Sent: Friday, December 02, 2016 6:56 PM
To: Sean Mullan; security-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: [9] RFR: 8168423: Test Task: Custom system class loader + security
manager + malformed policy file
Hi,
Please review the following patch,
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8161232
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssahoo/8161232/webrev.00/
Description:
It was reported the Test was failing with timeout consistently on macOS. There
is no log available anymore and the
Hi Artem,
I think building a String value from the actual result and displaying it
against expected in the Log output will be more convenient here.
Thanks,
Siba
From: Artem Smotrakov
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 10:54 PM
To: Sibabrata Sahoo; Weijun Wang; security-dev
Hi Max,
Here is the updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssahoo/8156054/webrev.01/
Thanks,
Siba
-Original Message-
From: Weijun Wang
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2016 4:25 PM
To: Sibabrata Sahoo; security-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [9] RFR: 8156054: Test Task: Develop
Hi,
Please review the patch for,
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8165660
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssahoo/8165660/webrev.00/
Description:
This is a simple fix for removing intermittent keyword from
sun/security/krb5/auto/MaxRetries.java file.
Thanks,
Hi,
Please review the patch for,
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8165825
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssahoo/8165825/webrev.00/
Description:
This is a simple fix for removing intermittent keyword from
sun/security/krb5/auto/Unreachable.java file.
Thanks,
Hi,
Please review the patch for,
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8156054
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssahoo/8156054/webrev.00/
Description:
It checks equals(), implies() and hashCode () of FilePermission when
"jdk.io.permissionsUseCanonicalPath" set and
: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 1:40 PM
To: Sibabrata Sahoo; security-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [9] RFR: 8164922:
sun/security/provider/SecureRandom/AutoReseed.java failed with timeout in
Ubuntu Linux.
Please just use othervm, and remove the finally block. If oldegd is null the
code change
Hi,
Please review the patch for "sun/security/provider/SecureRandom/AutoReseed.java
failed with timeout"
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8164922
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssahoo/8164922/webrev.00/
Description:
The Test was blocked while generating seed. I
Hi Max,
Here is updated webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssahoo/8015595/webrev.02/
Addressed all the following comments.
Thanks,
Siba
-Original Message-
From: Weijun Wang
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 6:14 PM
To: Sibabrata Sahoo; security-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [9] RFR
Hi Max,
Please find the updated webrev addressing all comments bellow:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssahoo/8015595/webrev.01/
Thanks,
Siba
-Original Message-
From: Weijun Wang
Sent: Monday, August 29, 2016 6:36 AM
To: Sibabrata Sahoo; security-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: [9] RFR
with
warning.
2) Removed the test from ProblemList.txt for MAC OS because of #1.
3) Uses only one KDC port in the configuration file.
4) Removed static "unreachable.krb5.conf" as the Test creates the file
during runtime.
Thanks,
Siba
From: Sibabrata Sahoo
Sent:
Hi,
Please review the patch for "sun/security/krb5/auto/Unreachable.java fails with
Timeout error"
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8015595
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssahoo/8015595/webrev.00/
Description:
When a KDC port is unreachable, Kerberos login module
Hi,
Please review the patch for intermittent failures in
"sun/security/krb5/auto/BadKdc*"
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8006690
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssahoo/8006690/webrev.00/
Description:
Some times when the test machine is slow the number of retry for
Hi,
Please review the patch for 2 issues on
"sun/security/krb5/auto/MaxRetries.java".
JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8153146
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8087144
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssahoo/8087144/webrev.00/
Description:
.net/~ssahoo/8159964/webrev.02/
Thanks,
Siba
-Original Message-
From: Wang Weijun
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 1:21 PM
To: Sibabrata Sahoo
Cc: security-dev@openjdk.java.net; Valerie Peng
Subject: Re: [9] RFR: 8159964: Update Tests to verify JDK build for
"JDK-8159488 De
Ping..
-Original Message-
From: Sibabrata Sahoo
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 7:28 PM
To: Weijun Wang; security-dev@openjdk.java.net; Valerie Peng
Subject: RE: [9] RFR: 8159964: Update Tests to verify JDK build for
"JDK-8159488 Deprivilege java.xml.crypto"
Hi Max,
Here is t
Hi Max,
Here is the updated webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssahoo/8159964/webrev.01/
Thanks,
Siba
-Original Message-
From: Weijun Wang
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 4:19 PM
To: Sibabrata Sahoo; security-dev@openjdk.java.net; Valerie Peng
Subject: Re: [9] RFR: 8159964: Update
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
