va.net/jdk/jdk/file/tip/src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/ssl/NamedGroup.java
> Gruss
> Bernd
>
>
> --
> http://bernd.eckenfels.net
>
> --------
> *Von:* security-dev im Auftrag
> von Tob
Hi Valerie and Bernd,
Valerie is right, I tested my JTREG Tests against SoftHSM2 in March:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2018-March/016863.html
I don't think there are more PKCS#11 related issues, as SunEC is not a PKCS#11
implementation. There are only shared tests.
The
smime.p7m
Description: S/MIME encrypted message
Hi Valerie and Tomas,
thanks for the hint about SoftHSM. I just found the time to test it. I was
able to run TestECDH using it with a SoftHSM2 based SunPKCS11 provider.
I did not hear anything about my last response - so I hope, this it might be
helpful. I wonder if there is anything left to
rovider SunPKCS11-NSS (28 ms).
...
Regards,
Tobias
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von:Valerie Peng <valerie.p...@oracle.com>
> Gesendet: Fre 9 Februar 2018 02:03
> An: Tobias Wagner <tobias.wag...@n-design.de>; security-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH]: Support
r and runs ECDSA signatures and
verifications
with all of them. The results of all curves are logged in the jtreg report of
TestEC.
I also changed the InvalidCurve test to use brainpoolP160r1 now, as
brainpoolP256r1 is supported
by using this patch.
>
> On 1/12/2018 9:12 AM,
Hi,
here is the next patch for brainpool curve support in SunEC.
Differences from the first patch:
* Brainpool curves with less than 256 bits are removed. Subsequently, the curve
oid check is made more robust to avoid null
pointer caused Segmentation Faults in memcmp calls.
* Bug JDK-8189594
Hi and a happy new year,
I did some further work reagarding the brainpool curves.
For the points about the removal of the small curves and the challenges with
that, please see below.
Regarding the test vectors for the brainpool curves, I'm planning to add a new
jtreg test to
sun.security.ec
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von:Adam Petcher <adam.petc...@oracle.com>
> Gesendet: Fre 15 Dezember 2017 20:57
> An: security-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH]: Support for brainpool curves from CurveDB in SunEC
>
> On 12/15/2017 11:31 AM, Tobias
Hi,
in our current project, we have the requirement to support brainpool curves for
TLS connections (RFC 7027).
As part of this requirement, we introduced the brainpoolP*r1 curves to SunEC,
as they are already known in sun.security.util.CurveDB. It does not introduce
the twisted curves from
le.com>
> Gesendet: Die 17 Oktober 2017 22:26
> An: security-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Betreff: Re: Arithmetic error in SunEC
>
> On 10/17/2017 4:55 AM, Tobias Wagner wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > we found an error in the GF(p)-arithmetics of SunEC, while adding
>
Hi,
we found an error in the GF(p)-arithmetics of SunEC, while adding
support for brainpool-curves in ECDHE for TLS connections as
suggested in RFC 7027. BrainpoolP256r1 and brainpoolP512r1 worked
out of the box, but brainpoolP384r1 did not. The calculated public keys were
not on that curve and
12 matches
Mail list logo