/24/2015 05:46 AM, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Sorry, just a reminder.
Thanks,
Alexander
On 8/18/2015 1:56 PM, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133802/webrev.00
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133802
Sorry, just a reminder.
Thanks,
Alexander
On 8/18/2015 1:56 PM, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133802/webrev.00
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133802
Just another portion of deprecated tags
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8133802/webrev.00
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8133802
Just another portion of deprecated tags replaced with {@code }
(some tags were replaced as well).
Thanks,
Alexander
Adding the forgotten mailing list...
On 28.07.2015 20:40, Alexander Stepanov wrote:
Hello Sean,
Thank you; the typos were fixed (sorry for inattention):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8132130/webrev.01/
Regards,
Alexander
On 27.07.2015 21:35, Sean Mullan wrote
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8132130/webrev.00/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8132130
Just some docs cleanup (fix invalid tags, parameter names, remove
obsolete tags)
Thanks,
Alexander
Hello,
Could you please review the fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8081517/webrev.00/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8081517
Just some cleanup for docs.
Thanks,
Alexander
same mistakes later? I
know IntelliJ IDEA will show errors for wrong @params names, but it
does not care about useless s.
Thanks
Max
On 5/6/2015 10:24 PM, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8079478/webrev.00/
for
https:
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8079478/webrev.00/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8079478
Just some doc fixes.
Please note: not sure if these docs should be fixed at all because in
the new modular system these packages should
did not check every line of the update. It's OK to me if
the update can pass a javadoc check.
Thanks,
Xuelei
On 4/24/2015 12:22 AM, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8078528/webrev.00/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.j
Sorry, just a reminder...
Regards,
Alexander
On 23.04.2015 19:22, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8078528/webrev.00/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078528
Just some HTML markup cleanup for docs
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8078528/webrev.00/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078528
Just some HTML markup cleanup for docs.
Thanks,
Alexander
Thanks!
On 10.04.2015 20:07, Sean Mullan wrote:
On 04/10/2015 12:01 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 10/04/2015 16:50, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8077332/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077332
Hello Alan,
Thank you.
Regards,
Alexander
On 10.04.2015 19:01, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 10/04/2015 16:50, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8077332/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8077332
Some HTML
Hello,
could you please review the following fix
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~avstepan/8076223/webrev.00/
for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8076223
Just some minor HTML markup fixes for documentation.
Thanks,
Alexander
Hello Sean,
Thank you.
Regards,
Alexander
On 12.03.2015 18:29, Sean Mullan wrote:
This looks fine to me. Note that the warning in PKCS8EncodedKeySpec
has already been fixed -- see JDK-8074788.
--Sean
On 03/10/2015 09:04 AM, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello Bradford,
I have finally to fix
in JDK code layout and contains
fixes for JDK-8040260, JDK-8028266.
Could please anyone from JCE team suggest what should be done for the
next step if the fixes are satisfactory?
Thanks,
Alexander
On 22.04.2014 16:41, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello Bradford,
Thanks,
Could you please
te the built JCE binaries for the javax.crypto
changes. Who is going to help you with that?
Brad
On 4/21/2014 3:11 AM, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028266
Webrev corresponding:
http://
Hello,
Could you please review the fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8028266
Webrev corresponding:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/JDK-8028266/webrev.00/
Just a minor cleanup of javadoc to avoid tidy warnings; no other code
affected.
Thanks.
Regards,
Alexan
nice to know! ;)
Thanks,
Brad
On 4/15/2014 5:24 AM, alexander stepanov wrote:
Hello,
Could you please review the fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8040260
Webrev corresponding:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8040260/webrev.00/
Just a very minor clean
Hello,
Could you please review the fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8040260
Webrev corresponding:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~yan/8040260/webrev.00/
Just a very minor cleanup of javadoc to avoid tidy warnings; no other
code affected.
Thanks.
Regards,
Alexa
20 matches
Mail list logo