Ok, thanks. Looks fine.
brad
On 11/9/2015 2:13 PM, Rajan Halade wrote:
Thanks for the comments, Brad. I have addressed those here -
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rhalade/8048356/webrev.01/
I plan to have this test to check for default provider only so
SecureRandom.getInstance(algorithm, provi
Thanks for the comments, Brad. I have addressed those here -
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rhalade/8048356/webrev.01/
I plan to have this test to check for default provider only so
SecureRandom.getInstance(algorithm, provider) API is not good fit here.
I think there are other tests which use thi
On 9/4/2015 1:43 PM, Rajan Halade wrote:
Please help with your review of this new test to check default provider
used with SecureRandom.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8048356
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rhalade/8048356/webrev.00/
51: Minor nit, you might reverse the
I might also suggest grabbing a byte from the various implementations to
ensure they return working implementations.
You should also include a comment which mentions that this is an
implementation-specific test for the Oracle & stock OpenJDK
implementations, and that other implementations migh
Please help with your review of this new test to check default provider
used with SecureRandom.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8048356
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rhalade/8048356/webrev.00/
Thanks,
Rajan
