On 07/08/2016 11:23 AM, Wang Weijun wrote:
Hi Tim
Are we seeing new failures in these tests?
I am asking this question because once upon a time (4 years ago) I
was involved in several RFEs [1][2][3] to do some similar the same
cleanup. Some tests were put into othervm mode, but for most others,
Hi Tim
Are we seeing new failures in these tests?
I am asking this question because once upon a time (4 years ago) I was involved
in several RFEs [1][2][3] to do some similar the same cleanup. Some tests were
put into othervm mode, but for most others, we tried our best to make them
runnable i
Looks fine.
--Sean
On 07/07/2016 05:11 AM, Tim Du wrote:
Hi Sean:
Thank you for reviewing the codes.
I updated the title for this bug and added othervm for the tests that
add but not remove their own provider. Also corrected the typo. New
webrev is available here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~t
Updated copyright , new webrev here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tidu/7052815/webrev.02/
Please help to review them ,Thanks.
Regards
Tim
On 2016/7/8 1:30, Rajan Halade wrote:
Hi Tim,
Please also update the copyright year to 2016 wherever applicable.
Thanks,
Rajan
On 7/7/16 2:11 AM, Tim Du w
Hi Tim,
Please also update the copyright year to 2016 wherever applicable.
Thanks,
Rajan
On 7/7/16 2:11 AM, Tim Du wrote:
Hi Sean:
Thank you for reviewing the codes.
I updated the title for this bug and added othervm for the tests that
add but not remove their own provider. Also corrected th
Hi Sean:
Thank you for reviewing the codes.
I updated the title for this bug and added othervm for the tests that
add but not remove their own provider. Also corrected the typo. New
webrev is available here:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~tidu/7052815/webrev.01/ .
Please help to review it again.
