Thanks for the comment.. I moved the code up toward the top.
Tony
On 6/9/20 4:04 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
A simple fix like this looks good to me. I may check this first, before
the EC available and signature checking.
Xuelei
On 6/9/2020 3:12 PM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
Hi,
I need a code rev
Thanks for catching that.
Tony
On 6/9/20 5:23 PM, Bradford Wetmore wrote:
Update the year, but otherwise looks good.
Brad
On 6/9/2020 4:04 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
A simple fix like this looks good to me. I may check this first,
before the EC available and signature checking.
Xuelei
On 6/9
Update the year, but otherwise looks good.
Brad
On 6/9/2020 4:04 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
A simple fix like this looks good to me. I may check this first, before
the EC available and signature checking.
Xuelei
On 6/9/2020 3:12 PM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
Hi,
I need a code review of this ver
A simple fix like this looks good to me. I may check this first, before
the EC available and signature checking.
Xuelei
On 6/9/2020 3:12 PM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
Hi,
I need a code review of this very simple change for a situation that I'm
not sure is a problem in the real world.
The or
Looks fine to me.
--Jamil
On 6/9/2020 3:12 PM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
Hi,
I need a code review of this very simple change for a situation that
I'm not sure is a problem in the real world.
The original TLS 1.3 putback added EdDSA to the TLS signature
extensions enumeration before there was
Hi,
I need a code review of this very simple change for a situation that I'm
not sure is a problem in the real world.
The original TLS 1.3 putback added EdDSA to the TLS signature extensions
enumeration before there was an EdDSA JCE implementation or JSSE
support. Without an implementation,
