I applied your patch and ran the regression tests, I noticed that both
>> the Solaris PKCS11 library and NSS skipped testing Brainpool curves with
>> different error codes which may be due to lack of support...
>>
>> Regards,
>> Valerie
TestECDH.jtr
Description: Binary data
openjdk_jdk_49130.patch
Description: Binary data
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
rovider SunPKCS11-NSS (28 ms).
...
Regards,
Tobias
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von:Valerie Peng
> Gesendet: Fre 9 Februar 2018 02:03
> An: Tobias Wagner ; security-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH]: Support for brainpool curves from CurveDB in SunEC
>
> Hi Tobias,
&
ch PKCS11 library did you use to test your patch? After
> I applied your patch and ran the regression tests, I noticed that both
> the Solaris PKCS11 library and NSS skipped testing Brainpool curves with
> different error codes which may be due to lack of support...
>
> Regards,
>
Hi Tobias,
Just curious, which PKCS11 library did you use to test your patch? After
I applied your patch and ran the regression tests, I noticed that both
the Solaris PKCS11 library and NSS skipped testing Brainpool curves with
different error codes which may be due to lack of support
On 1/18/2018 2:57 PM, Adam Petcher wrote:
I applied your patch and ran some initial tests, and everything looks
good so far. I'm running the the regression tests on all platforms,
and I'll let you know how it goes.
Regression tests passed, and this patch is ready to be reviewed.
I applied your patch and ran some initial tests, and everything looks
good so far. I'm running the the regression tests on all platforms, and
I'll let you know how it goes.
We need a JDK Reviewer to review and approve the code, so I'm hoping
someone will volunteer to take a look. For the benef
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von:Adam Petcher
> Gesendet: Die 16 Januar 2018 18:38
> An: security-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH]: Support for brainpool curves from CurveDB in SunEC
>
> Great! I took a look at the patch, and I have some comments, the first
&
t that signs and verifies using the new curves
should be sufficient.
On 1/12/2018 9:12 AM, Tobias Wagner wrote:
Hi,
here is the next patch for brainpool curve support in SunEC.
Differences from the first patch:
* Brainpool curves with less than 256 bits are removed. Subsequently, the curv
Hi,
here is the next patch for brainpool curve support in SunEC.
Differences from the first patch:
* Brainpool curves with less than 256 bits are removed. Subsequently, the curve
oid check is made more robust to avoid null
pointer caused Segmentation Faults in memcmp calls.
* Bug JDK-8189594
On 1/4/2018 7:42 AM, Tobias Wagner wrote:
Hi and a happy new year,
I did some further work reagarding the brainpool curves.
For the points about the removal of the small curves and the challenges with
that, please see below.
Regarding the test vectors for the brainpool curves, I'm pla
Hi and a happy new year,
I did some further work reagarding the brainpool curves.
For the points about the removal of the small curves and the challenges with
that, please see below.
Regarding the test vectors for the brainpool curves, I'm planning to add a new
jtreg test to
sun.securi
On 12/16/2017 2:52 PM, Tobias Wagner wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von:Adam Petcher
Gesendet: Fre 15 Dezember 2017 20:57
An: security-dev@openjdk.java.net
Betreff: Re: [PATCH]: Support for brainpool curves from CurveDB in SunEC
4) How important are the 224-bit and smaller curves
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von:Adam Petcher
> Gesendet: Fre 15 Dezember 2017 20:57
> An: security-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH]: Support for brainpool curves from CurveDB in SunEC
>
> On 12/15/2017 11:31 AM, Tobias Wagner wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
On 12/15/2017 11:31 AM, Tobias Wagner wrote:
Hi,
in our current project, we have the requirement to support brainpool curves for
TLS connections (RFC 7027).
As part of this requirement, we introduced the brainpoolP*r1 curves to SunEC,
as they are already known in sun.security.util.CurveDB
Hi,
in our current project, we have the requirement to support brainpool curves for
TLS connections (RFC 7027).
As part of this requirement, we introduced the brainpoolP*r1 curves to SunEC,
as they are already known in sun.security.util.CurveDB. It does not introduce
the twisted curves from
Hi,
If the JDK devs are interested we have a patch against the latest JDK 7
with Brainpool support through PKCS#11, so we can use Brainpool curves
with HSMs (used in production).
For SW based crypto we just use BouncyCastle (http://www.bouncycastle.org).
Regards,
Tomas
**
PrimeKey
Am Mittwoch, den 23.09.2015, 17:27 +0200 schrieb Tomas Gustavsson:
> +1 for this.
+1 also from my side. Brainpool is really important in Europe.
>
> On 2015-09-17 19:53, Sean Mullan wrote:
> > On 08/19/2015 05:48 PM, Jiri Stary wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
>
+1 for this.
On 2015-09-17 19:53, Sean Mullan wrote:
On 08/19/2015 05:48 PM, Jiri Stary wrote:
Hello,
do you plan to support brainpool curves for TLS in Java 9 (RFC 7027) ?
There is no plan to support it in 9. There is an open RFE for supporting
brainpool in JCE: https
On 08/19/2015 05:48 PM, Jiri Stary wrote:
Hello,
do you plan to support brainpool curves for TLS in Java 9 (RFC 7027) ?
There is no plan to support it in 9. There is an open RFE for supporting
brainpool in JCE: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7007966 but
no specific release has
Hello,
do you plan to support brainpool curves for TLS in Java 9 (RFC 7027) ?
Regards
Jiri
Sent from [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.ch), encrypted email based in
Switzerland.
20 matches
Mail list logo