On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 20:39:13 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
>> StringBuffer is a legacy synchronized class. There are more modern
>> alternatives which perform better:
>> 1. Plain String concatenation should be preferred
>> 2. StringBuilder is a direct replacement to StringBuffer which generally
> StringBuffer is a legacy synchronized class. There are more modern
> alternatives which perform better:
> 1. Plain String concatenation should be preferred
> 2. StringBuilder is a direct replacement to StringBuffer which generally have
> better performance
>
> In
On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 20:33:20 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> reverted changes in this spec.
>
> Did you modify the PR? I am unable to locate the revert.
Oops. Forgot to push
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/5432
On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 21:05:46 GMT, Andrey Turbanov wrote:
>> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/Character.java line 123:
>>
>>> 121: * than U+ are called supplementary characters. The Java
>>> 122: * platform uses the UTF-16 representation in {@code char} arrays and
>>> 123: * in the
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 16:48:06 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> StringBuffer is a legacy synchronized class. There are more modern
>> alternatives which perform better:
>> 1. Plain String concatenation should be preferred
>> 2. StringBuilder is a direct replacement to StringBuffer which generally
>>
On Thu, 9 Sep 2021 06:50:21 GMT, Andrey Turbanov
wrote:
> StringBuffer is a legacy synchronized class. There are more modern
> alternatives which perform better:
> 1. Plain String concatenation should be preferred
> 2. StringBuilder is a direct replacement to StringBuffer which generally have
StringBuffer is a legacy synchronized class. There are more modern alternatives
which perform better:
1. Plain String concatenation should be preferred
2. StringBuilder is a direct replacement to StringBuffer which generally have
better performance
In
