FYI, I plan to fix this by way of:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8186217
Remove erroneous @hidden JavaDoc tag from
java.util.Properties.replace(Object, Object, Object)
-Brent
On 8/14/17 10:02 AM, Brent Christian wrote:
Hi, Max
This tag snuck in by mistake. Before pushing the fi
Hi, Max
This tag snuck in by mistake. Before pushing the fix for JDK-8029891,
we looked into ways to avoid addition of JavaDoc for all the
trivial method overrides. I tried adding @hidden tags,
but they didn't do what we wanted, so they were taken out. Except one -
sorry about that.
-Bren
>
> FWIW, there is one remaining issue to be addressed: it is a broken link in
> Provider.html.
> It comes from Provider.replace(Object, Object, Object) which overrides
> Properties.replace(Object, Object, Object), but for some reason, that method
> is
> marked @hidden in Properties, causing a b
Brad,
Thanks. I should have noted that the issues were detected by checking tools,
and that after the edits, no such issues were reported in this package.
FWIW, there is one remaining issue to be addressed: it is a broken link
in Provider.html.
It comes from Provider.replace(Object, Object, Ob
Changes look good to me, although I'm not an HTML expert nor an expert
in our current documentation style. I did compare the output, and can
see the effects. (Striped, scope (row vs col), style)
Brad
On 8/11/2017 5:01 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
Please review the following small fix for so
Please review the following small fix for some accessibility issues in
the java.security package.
3 tables are converted to the de-facto JDK standard for row-oriented
tables, and updated
with appropriate scope=row|col attributes to identify the header cell in
each row or column.
You can see t
