On 1/11/2016 10:50 AM, joe darcy wrote:
> Hi Xuelei,
>
> I'm not a concurrency expert, but I don't think it is proper to only
> synchronize on the writing of a data structure -- the reading should be
> synchronized too.
>
Yes. The fix considered the reading side too. The reading of the
serverPo
Hi Xuelei,
I'm not a concurrency expert, but I don't think it is proper to only
synchronize on the writing of a data structure -- the reading should be
synchronized too.
Have you reproduced the failure with the code and seen the failure go
away with the new code? Is there a hypothesis on why
Looks fine to me.
BTW, the fix for JDK-8146387 is asking for code review.
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2016-January/013301.html
Thanks,
Xuelei
On 1/11/2016 4:54 AM, joe darcy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The test
>
> javax/net/ssl/SSLSession/SessionCacheSizeTests.java
>
> has b
