Understood.
Fixes look good.
On 24/09/2012 21:27, Valerie (Yu-Ching) Peng wrote:
Vinnie,
Thanks for the comment!
The reason that I use "<" instead of "<=" on line 150 is because that
(1024, 160) is supported by the DSAGenParameterSpec class and thus I
didn't view this as legacy value. Either in
Vinnie,
Thanks for the comment!
The reason that I use "<" instead of "<=" on line 150 is because that
(1024, 160) is supported by the DSAGenParameterSpec class and thus I
didn't view this as legacy value. Either init(...) calls should work for
1024, so I'd like to use the newer form of init(..
Fixes look good.
Just a minor comment at l.150 of ParameterCache: the test could use '<='??
On 22 Sep 2012, at 00:45, Valerie (Yu-Ching) Peng wrote:
> Hi, Vinnie,
>
> Can you please review these following 2 JDK8 fixes? They are straight forward
> regressions found by SQE tests introduced as byp
