On 20 Apr 2016, at 20:34, Claes Redestad wrote:
>
>
> On 2016-04-20 20:51, Chris Hegarty wrote:
>> On 20 Apr 2016, at 15:44, Claes Redestad wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> now that the sun.security.action package is encapsulated we can simplify
>>> internal code to get System properties.
>>>
On 2016-04-20 20:51, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 20 Apr 2016, at 15:44, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hello,
now that the sun.security.action package is encapsulated we can simplify
internal code to get System properties.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8154231
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk
On 20 Apr 2016, at 15:44, Claes Redestad wrote:
> Hello,
>
> now that the sun.security.action package is encapsulated we can simplify
> internal code to get System properties.
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8154231
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8154231/webr
On 2016-04-20 16:58, Wang Weijun wrote:
This is quite convenient.
Glad you like it!
We not cover the other modules?
exports sun.security.action to
java.desktop,
java.security.jgss,
jdk.crypto.pkcs11;
I was worried I included too many changes in this patch as
Hi Claes, thanks.
Am 20.04.2016 um 18:12 schrieb Claes Redestad:
Thanks for looking at this, Ulf!
- Isn't the "theProp" naming style something from an old usage where all members have been named
myXyz? I more would like "propName" or just "property".
I chose to go with keeping names in line
Thanks for looking at this, Ulf!
On 2016-04-20 17:57, Ulf Zibis wrote:
Hi,
here my comments:
Am 20.04.2016 um 16:44 schrieb Claes Redestad:
Hello,
now that the sun.security.action package is encapsulated we can
simplify internal code to get System properties.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.jav
This is quite convenient. We not cover the other modules?
exports sun.security.action to
java.desktop,
java.security.jgss,
jdk.crypto.pkcs11;
Thanks
Max
> On Apr 20, 2016, at 10:44 PM, Claes Redestad
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> now that the sun.security.action package
