On 3/24/2015 2:47 AM, Wang Weijun wrote:
Hi All
Please review the code change at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8056174/webrev.00/
It provides a new jdk.Exported API JarSigner to perform jar signing. The class
contains popular functions of the jarsigner tool. The jarsigner tool is
un
Hi,
I'd like a review of the below webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ascarpino/8064546/webrev/
The code change is very simple, where close() should not throw
exceptions. Most of the code change is comments that are just informational
The attached test goes through all the scenarios making
Hi Bernd,
On 03/24/2015 07:28 AM, Bernd wrote:
Hello,
it is good to see Java 8 support EDH with 1024 and 2048 bit keys.
However it is still a problem that there is no negotiation in the TLS
handshake and so a flexible client should be able to accept different
key siztes. Apache since 2.4.7 send
On 03/24/2015 05:47 AM, Wang Weijun wrote:
Hi All
Please review the code change at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8056174/webrev.00/
It provides a new jdk.Exported API JarSigner to perform jar signing. The class
contains popular functions of the jarsigner tool. The jarsigner tool is
Please review this revision:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~juh/7145757/01/
* all get()/set() calls to CertificateExtensions and CRLExtensions
is by OID
* get()/set() from X509CertImpl/Info continue to work by name.
ex: X509CertImpl.get("x509.info.extensions.")
* a global nameCache is maintained
> On Mar 27, 2015, at 04:41, Sean Mullan wrote:
>
> On 03/24/2015 05:47 AM, Wang Weijun wrote:
>> Hi All
>>
>> Please review the code change at
>>
>>http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8056174/webrev.00/
>>
>> It provides a new jdk.Exported API JarSigner to perform jar signing. The
>> cla
