Please take a look at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8077670/webrev.00/
The test now tries to find an available port in a loop.
Thanks
Max
Hi Max,
I don't know the specifics of this test, but can it use the ephemeral
port pattern, ds = new DatagramSocket(); ds.getLocalPort()? Rather than
looping.
-Chris.
On 26/08/15 08:57, Weijun Wang wrote:
Please take a look at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8077670/webrev.00/
The
Hi Chris
I don't know about that method. Will try.
This test is trying to start a UDP server that does nothing so that its
client receives neither a PortUnreachableException nor a valid reply and
can only timeout.
Thanks
Max
On 08/26/2015 04:05 PM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
Hi Max,
I don't kno
Hi,
when running coverity checks on
src/jdk.crypto.ec/share/native/libsunec/impl/ecdecode.c we had a finding that
potentially the buffer "genenc" in function "gf_populate_params" could be
exceeded as the length of input strings for the strcat operations is not
checked. A check to satisfy cover
This looks ok now, although I would probably eliminate the tests for
SHA-1 and bump up the keysize to 2048, so that this test won't have to
be updated when those algorithms/keysizes are constrained in the future.
--Sean
On 08/25/2015 02:30 PM, Rajan Halade wrote:
On 8/25/15 10:09 AM, Sean M
Great it works for me.
Webrev updated at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8077670/webrev.01/.
Thanks
Max
On 08/26/2015 10:11 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Hi Chris
I don't know about that method. Will try.
This test is trying to start a UDP server that does nothing so that its
client receives nei
Please review this change to the KeyStore.getInstance(File,LoadStoreParameter)
method to correctly handle its LoadStoreParameter argument.
It now extracts the embedded password before calling the
KeyStore.load(InputStream,char[]) method.
This fix corrects a JCK test that had been failing.
Thanks
> On 26 Aug 2015, at 16:56, Weijun Wang wrote:
>
> Great it works for me.
>
> Webrev updated at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8077670/webrev.01/.
Looks good to me Max.
-Chris.
> Thanks
> Max
>
> On 08/26/2015 10:11 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
>> Hi Chris
>>
>> I don't know about that metho
Hi Sean,
On 8/26/15 8:39 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
This looks ok now, although I would probably eliminate the tests for
SHA-1 and bump up the keysize to 2048, so that this test won't have to
be updated when those algorithms/keysizes are constrained in the future.
I would take up other enhancements
Please review
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8134555/webrev.00/
The test was mistakenly removed in a previous changeset. Restored now.
Thanks
Max
10 matches
Mail list logo