Hi,
This test failed several times, and it's better to put it to ProblemList
until the issue is resolved.
Please review this patch, thanks!
Best regards,
John Jiang
On 2016/4/1 15:58, John Jiang wrote:
Hi,
Because of JDK-8137255, it needs to add test
sun/security/provider/NSASuiteB/TestDSAGe
Looks fine to me.
Xuelei
On 4/6/2016 9:04 PM, John Jiang wrote:
> Hi,
> This test failed several times, and it's better to put it to ProblemList
> until the issue is resolved.
> Please review this patch, thanks!
>
> Best regards,
> John Jiang
>
> On 2016/4/1 15:58, John Jiang wrote:
>> Hi,
>> B
I just posted a new version of rfc5653bis.
The major changes in this I-D (compared to RFC 5653) are:
1. public byte[] GSSException#getOutputToken(). If initSecContext or
acceptSecContext fail, the exception could contain a token that can be sent to
the peer. For kerberos 5, this is normally a K
I need a review of this very simple doc clarification. Calling out
jdk.security.provider.preferred as a "security property" instead of just
a "property".
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ascarpino/8152205/webrev/
thanks.
Tony
Looks fine to me.
Xuelei
On 4/7/2016 5:23 AM, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
> I need a review of this very simple doc clarification. Calling out
> jdk.security.provider.preferred as a "security property" instead of just
> a "property".
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ascarpino/8152205/webrev/
>
> th
Ping ...
On 1/20/2016 9:14 AM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
> Ping ...
>
> On 12/8/2015 8:12 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
>> Good catch!
>>
>> I copied the comment here:
>>
>> --
>> SocketFactory sslsf = SSLSocketFactory.getDefault();
>> SSLSocket ssls = (SSLSocket) sslsf.createSocket();
>> s
If I was doing this from scratch, I would probably capitalize it to
indicate it's a java.security.Security property and add inside the @code.
{@code jdk.security.provider.preferred} security
->
{@code jdk.security.provider.preferred Security}
But I see it done that way in other places, so this
In my DRBG changeset, I use this style:
{@code jdk.security.provider.preferred} {@linkplain
Security#getProperty(String) security property}
--Max
> On Apr 7, 2016, at 8:23 AM, Bradford Wetmore
> wrote:
>
> If I was doing this from scratch, I would probably capitalize it to indicate
> it's
sun/security/pkcs11/Provider/Login.sh
This test is known to fail at Linux platform (JDK-8153545).
Please review the patch to put the test to ProblemList.txt for linux-all
until mentioned issue (JDK-8153545) is resolved.
Tested with jtreg -listtests
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK
That looks fine to me.
Thanks.
> On 7 Apr 2016, at 04:42, Amy Lu wrote:
>
> sun/security/pkcs11/Provider/Login.sh
> This test is known to fail at Linux platform (JDK-8153545).
>
> Please review the patch to put the test to ProblemList.txt for linux-all
> until mentioned issue (JDK-8153545) i
10 matches
Mail list logo
