Re: RFR: 8172048: Re-examine use of AtomicReference in java.security.Policy

2017-01-02 Thread Claes Redestad
On 12/31/2016 12:45 AM, David Holmes wrote: I'll let you think about it so more. I'll be back in the office on Tuesday :) After giving it some thought I think it's better to just document the need for some hygiene in the field declaration: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~redestad/8172048/webrev.02

TLS-PSK status ?

2017-01-02 Thread Simone Bordet
Hi, https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6476446 is closed as a duplicate of JDK-8049402, but unfortunately this latter issue is not public. Is there any status about the implementation of TLS-PSK (RFC 4279, 4785, 5489) ? Thanks ! -- Simone Bordet http://bordet.blogspot.com --- Finally, n

Re: RFR: 8172048: Re-examine use of AtomicReference in java.security.Policy

2017-01-02 Thread Chris Hegarty
> On 2 Jan 2017, at 11:45, Claes Redestad wrote: > > On 12/31/2016 12:45 AM, David Holmes wrote: >> I'll let you think about it so more. I'll be back in the office on Tuesday :) > > After giving it some thought I think it's better to just document the need > for some hygiene in the field declar

Re: RFR: 8172048: Re-examine use of AtomicReference in java.security.Policy

2017-01-02 Thread Claes Redestad
On 2017-01-02 18:02, Chris Hegarty wrote: On 2 Jan 2017, at 11:45, Claes Redestad wrote: On 12/31/2016 12:45 AM, David Holmes wrote: I'll let you think about it so more. I'll be back in the office on Tuesday :) After giving it some thought I think it's better to just document the need fo

Re: RFR: 8172048: Re-examine use of AtomicReference in java.security.Policy

2017-01-02 Thread David Holmes
On 2/01/2017 9:45 PM, Claes Redestad wrote: On 12/31/2016 12:45 AM, David Holmes wrote: I'll let you think about it so more. I'll be back in the office on Tuesday :) After giving it some thought I think it's better to just document the need for some hygiene in the field declaration: http://cr

Re: RFR 8172017: Two tests sun/security/krb5/auto/ReplayCacheTestProc.java and rcache_usemd5.sh fail on Solaris (Additional pre-authentication required)

2017-01-02 Thread Wang Weijun
Ping again. On 12/27/2016 3:25 AM, Wang Weijun wrote: Please take a review at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8172017/webrev.00 On Solaris when launched by root, the rcache directory is a little different. I've manually tested this on a Solaris machine, and seen rcache files created at dif

Re: RFR 8170732: GssKrb5Client sends non-zero buffer size when qop is "auth"

2017-01-02 Thread Wang Weijun
Ping again. On 12/22/2016 9:52 AM, Wang Weijun wrote: Please take a review at http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8170732/webrev.00/ According to https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4752#section-3.1: The client then constructs data, with the first octet containing the bit-mask specifying the select

Re: RFR 8157389: Release Note: New default -sigalg for jarsigner and keytool

2017-01-02 Thread Wang Weijun
Ping again. Please review https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8157389. JDK-8171190 was already resolved. Thanks Max > On Dec 14, 2016, at 10:04 AM, Wang Weijun wrote: > > I copied the exact @implNote from JarSigner into the release note. > > BTW, I noticed NIST 800-57 Part 1 has a new re