Changes looks fine.
One day we can modify it to a Java program using SecurityTools::jarsigner.
Thanks
Max
> On Jul 6, 2018, at 5:34 PM, Ramanand Patil wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> Please review this trivial test fix:
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8134124
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.j
Please take a review at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8198352/webrev.00/
You should not use resources in hashCode().
Thanks
Max
Looks fine to me.
Xuelei
On 7/8/2018 8:02 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Please take a review at
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/8198352/webrev.00/
You should not use resources in hashCode().
Thanks
Max
Please review the backports of JDK-8175120 and JDK-8164656.
Overview - Removing old tests on KDC timeout policy and replacing it with new
one.
Original mail threads
JDK-8164656 -
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2016-August/014696.html
JDK-8175120 -
http://mail.openjdk.