On 28/08/2018 15:17, Xuelei Fan wrote:
Hi,
Please review this release note:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210070
Per the "supported_groups" extension specification, the
supported_groups extension should not present in the ServerHello
handshake message. JDK 11 cannot work wit
Hi Max :
>
> - No need to "import java.security.Security".
Sure I can remove this, it is a leftover.
> - In the updated read() method, I think there is no need to use an "int
> offset"
> parameter. "int lineNumber" is enough and you can modify it and return it
> without a new local variable.
> On Aug 31, 2018, at 8:52 PM, Baesken, Matthias
> wrote:
>
> Hi Max :
>
>>
>> - No need to "import java.security.Security".
>
> Sure I can remove this, it is a leftover.
>
>> - In the updated read() method, I think there is no need to use an "int
>> offset"
>> parameter. "int lineNumbe
As we don't fix it in JDK 11, it is intended to have a known issue note
for JDK 11.
Xuelei
On 8/31/2018 12:25 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 28/08/2018 15:17, Xuelei Fan wrote:
Hi,
Please review this release note:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8210070
Per the "supported_groups"
On 31/08/2018 15:07, Xuelei Fan wrote:
As we don't fix it in JDK 11, it is intended to have a known issue
note for JDK 11.
Yes, a RN-KnownIssue make sense, I'm just trying to understand there is
a note showing up under "Build 9". It may be that whatever generates
this preview page is using t
I would suggest contacting o...@openjdk.java.net, they should be able to
answer these kinds of infrastructure questions.
Best wishes,
Brad
On 8/30/2018 6:32 PM, David Black wrote:
Hi,
I am asking this because I am not able to find information on if
openjdk uses signed tags/commits & because t
Hi Martin,
In TestTLS12.java, you call the initSecmod() inside initialize() and
when initSecmod() returns false, you return from initialize() and
continue down the main(). Is this intentional? Other tests seems to be
skipping execution when initSecmod() return false.
Changes in webrev.08 res
Hi Martin,
With the new model of "creating the key handle as needed", I think we
should not allow the direct access of keyID field outside of P11Key
class. This field should be made private and accessed through methods.
In addition, existing PKCS11.C_XXX() methods with P11 keyID arguments
can
