I received quite a bit of feedback that questions the value of the new
provider, and the "branchless mode" in general. At the same time, nobody
has told me that this mode would be useful to them. So I am removing it
from the JEP. In short, I will only be doing the second bullet point
from my la
Looks fine to me.
--Sean
On 9/24/18 11:59 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
Ping again.
On Sep 5, 2018, at 12:17 PM, Weijun Wang wrote:
I ran javadoc on test/lib so I can learn the useful helper classes, and find
out SecurityTools.java has no javadoc at all.
Please review this change
http://cr.o
For those of you that are not also subscribed to security-dev, this is
mostly FYI, as the review is winding down, but if you have any comments,
let me know.
This change will add new token options ("allow" and "disallow") to the
java.security.manager system property. The "disallow" option is in
Hi Martin,
I found the problem causing the one regression test failure and fixed
it. Now Mach5 run is clean.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~valeriep/6913047Exp/webrev.02
I also made various changes hoping to improve things. You can compare
the files in above webrev with yours for differences. G
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 07:54:15AM +0100, Alan Bateman wrote:
> The "How to contribute" [1] is the best place to start. I see you
> are listed on the OCA signatories so that gets you through step 0.
Indeed. Figuring out how to deal with the OCA is a large reason we took
so long to begin this cont
Hi Nico,
Thanks for submitting the patches, Max is off on Chinese holidays til
7th and I am going to be on vacation til 19th.
I suppose no bugs have been filed for these issues? Max and I will take
a look upon our return.
Regards,
Valerie
On 10/3/2018 2:30 PM, Nico Williams wrote:
On We
Yes, I am on vacation now.
When I’m back, I’ll post your changes to cr.openjdk.java.net first.
Thanks
Max
> 在 2018年10月4日，06:13，Valerie Peng 写道：
>
> Hi Nico,
>
> Thanks for submitting the patches, Max is off on Chinese holidays til 7th and
> I am going to be on vacation til 19th.
>
> I supp
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 03:13:55PM -0700, Valerie Peng wrote:
> Thanks for submitting the patches, Max is off on Chinese holidays
> til 7th and I am going to be on vacation til 19th.
>
> I suppose no bugs have been filed for these issues? Max and I will
> take a look upon our return.
Great! And
Hi Sean,
The new arrangement of using special tokens for java.security.manager makes a
lot more sense than having a separate property. Overall, the proposed semantics
seem reasonable to me.
I have some suggestions to clarify the proposed specification. (But also see
below.) From webrev.01:
Hi, Sean.
One question related to SecurityManager and performance, is it possible
to provide a special version of AccessController.doPrivileged which will
be noop if SecurityManager is not present?
On 03/10/2018 13:12, Sean Mullan wrote:
For those of you that are not also subscribed to securit
10 matches
Mail list logo
