Hi,
May I have the CSR reviewed?
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8233652
The system property, "jsse.enableMFLNExtension", was introduced in JDK 9
(See JSSE Reference Guides). However, the implementation code uses
"jsse.enableMFLExtension" (without 'N') instead.
As the system prop
I understand the desire to change this, but are we sure the doc should be
changed instead of the property? I would tend to believe users code to the doc
and don’t notice it wasn’t working. Not reading the source code and code to
that implemented name. Otherwise I’d assume someone would have
Hi Xuelei,
Updated webrev looks good.
If we have a failing test to verify the changes, perhaps you can try
disabling the CKM_RSA_PKCS_PSS in the PKCS11 provider configuration
file. Or, you can always comment out the PSS Signature entry
registration in SunPKCS11 provider.
Thanks,
Valerie
On
I understand your points. Between using the doc name and the code name, I
think using the code name is a little bit safer if someone really use the impl
name. However, just a little bit. I’m open to use the doc name if we could
get an agreement.
Xuelei
> On Nov 5, 2019, at 4:32 PM, Antho
