Re: RFR: 8282662: Use List.of() factory method to reduce memory consumption [v7]

> `List.of()` along with `Set.of()` create unmodifiable `List/Set` but with > smaller footprint comparing to `Arrays.asList()` / `new HashSet()` when > called with vararg of size 0, 1, 2. > > In general replacement of `Arrays.asList()` with `List.of()` is dubious as > the latter is

Re: RFR: 8277307: Pre shared key sent under both session_ticket and pre_shared_key extensions

On Fri, 27 May 2022 13:20:24 GMT, Daniel Jeliński wrote: > Session ticket extension should only contain pre-TLS1.3 stateless session > tickets; it should not be used for sending TLS1.3 pre-shared keys. src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/ssl/SessionTicketExtension.java line 410: > 408:

Re: RFR: 8282662: Use List.of() factory method to reduce memory consumption [v7]

On Tue, 31 May 2022 07:40:56 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов wrote: >> `List.of()` along with `Set.of()` create unmodifiable `List/Set` but with >> smaller footprint comparing to `Arrays.asList()` / `new HashSet()` when >> called with vararg of size 0, 1, 2. >> >> In general replacement of

Re: RFR: 8282662: Use List.of() factory method to reduce memory consumption [v7]

On Tue, 31 May 2022 07:40:56 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов wrote: >> `List.of()` along with `Set.of()` create unmodifiable `List/Set` but with >> smaller footprint comparing to `Arrays.asList()` / `new HashSet()` when >> called with vararg of size 0, 1, 2. >> >> In general replacement of

Re: RFR: 8282662: Use List.of() factory method to reduce memory consumption [v8]

On Tue, 31 May 2022 19:33:15 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote: >> Сергей Цыпанов has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a >> merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes >> brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains six additional >>

Re: RFR: 8282662: Use List.of() factory method to reduce memory consumption [v8]

> `List.of()` along with `Set.of()` create unmodifiable `List/Set` but with > smaller footprint comparing to `Arrays.asList()` / `new HashSet()` when > called with vararg of size 0, 1, 2. > > In general replacement of `Arrays.asList()` with `List.of()` is dubious as > the latter is

Re: RFR: 8282662: Use List.of() factory method to reduce memory consumption [v8]

On Tue, 31 May 2022 19:30:07 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов wrote: >> `List.of()` along with `Set.of()` create unmodifiable `List/Set` but with >> smaller footprint comparing to `Arrays.asList()` / `new HashSet()` when >> called with vararg of size 0, 1, 2. >> >> In general replacement of

Re: RFR: 8282662: Use List.of() factory method to reduce memory consumption [v8]

On Tue, 31 May 2022 19:30:07 GMT, Сергей Цыпанов wrote: >> `List.of()` along with `Set.of()` create unmodifiable `List/Set` but with >> smaller footprint comparing to `Arrays.asList()` / `new HashSet()` when >> called with vararg of size 0, 1, 2. >> >> In general replacement of