Changeset: b816baf594e3
Author:mikejwre
Date: 2010-03-04 13:50 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/langtools/rev/b816baf594e3
Added tag jdk7-b85 for changeset 136bfc679462
! .hgtags
Changeset: ef07347428f2
Author:lana
Date: 2010-03-09 15:29 -0800
URL: http
Changeset: 03cd9e62961f
Author:mikejwre
Date: 2010-03-04 13:50 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/03cd9e62961f
Added tag jdk7-b85 for changeset b396584a3e64
! .hgtags
Changeset: 840601ac5ab7
Author:rkennke
Date: 2010-03-03 15:50 +0100
URL: http://
Changeset: 512b0e924a5a
Author:mikejwre
Date: 2010-03-04 13:50 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jaxws/rev/512b0e924a5a
Added tag jdk7-b85 for changeset 8424512588ff
! .hgtags
Changeset: 81c0f115bbe5
Author:mikejwre
Date: 2010-03-04 13:50 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jaxp/rev/81c0f115bbe5
Added tag jdk7-b85 for changeset 6c0ccabb430d
! .hgtags
Changeset: 418bc80ce139
Author:mikejwre
Date: 2010-03-04 13:50 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/hotspot/rev/418bc80ce139
Added tag jdk7-b85 for changeset 6c9796468b91
! .hgtags
Changeset: bf823ef06b4f
Author:trims
Date: 2010-03-08 15:50 -0800
URL: http:
Changeset: 6253e28826d1
Author:mikejwre
Date: 2010-03-04 13:50 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/corba/rev/6253e28826d1
Added tag jdk7-b85 for changeset c67a9df7bc0c
! .hgtags
Changeset: 3ddf90b39176
Author:mikejwre
Date: 2010-03-04 13:50 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/rev/3ddf90b39176
Added tag jdk7-b85 for changeset cf26288a114b
! .hgtags
Changeset: 433a60a9c0bf
Author:lana
Date: 2010-03-09 15:28 -0800
URL: http://hg.open
Hi Valerie
As described in http://forums.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5432248, customer's
pkcs11 keystore has aliases ended with '\0'.
Is this something we should fix on the Java side?
Thanks
Max
Changeset: c52f292a8f86
Author:valeriep
Date: 2010-03-18 17:05 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/c52f292a8f86
6695485: SignedObject constructor throws ProviderException if it's called using
provider "SunPKCS11-Solaris"
Summary: Added checking for RSA key lengths
On 18 March 2010 21:12, Christopher Hegarty -Sun Microsystems Ireland
wrote:
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>>
>> On 18 March 2010 20:56, Christopher Hegarty -Sun Microsystems Ireland
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Brad, Pavel, Andrew,
>>>
>>> I'm also not comfortable with this test, but what bothers me more tha
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
On 18 March 2010 20:56, Christopher Hegarty -Sun Microsystems Ireland
wrote:
Brad, Pavel, Andrew,
I'm also not comfortable with this test, but what bothers me more than the
reliance on an external server is the reliance on cacerts. While cacerts (or
equivalent) is not
On 18 March 2010 20:56, Christopher Hegarty -Sun Microsystems Ireland
wrote:
> Brad, Pavel, Andrew,
>
> I'm also not comfortable with this test, but what bothers me more than the
> reliance on an external server is the reliance on cacerts. While cacerts (or
> equivalent) is not part of OpenJDK I d
Brad, Pavel, Andrew,
I'm also not comfortable with this test, but what bothers me more than
the reliance on an external server is the reliance on cacerts. While
cacerts (or equivalent) is not part of OpenJDK I don't think it makes
sense adding a test to OpenJDK that has a reliance on it.
For
On 18 March 2010 18:40, Brad Wetmore wrote:
>
> I have a couple important tasks to finish ASAP, so if there is more
> discussion, I'll have to jump in sometime next week, but wanted to add
> one thing before anything was done:
>
> Pavel wrote:
>> And we can use other URL if verisign.com is problem
I have a couple important tasks to finish ASAP, so if there is more
discussion, I'll have to jump in sometime next week, but wanted to add
one thing before anything was done:
Pavel wrote:
> And we can use other URL if verisign.com is problematic.
We've tried to limit the reliance on servers outs
On 18 March 2010 15:13, Sean Mullan wrote:
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
>> This has been posted about before; OpenJDK currently can't bootstrap
>> itself because it doesn't have a working cacerts store (the JAXP URL
>> uses https).
>>
>> I don't know how to solve this; we can certainly have the c
On 18 March 2010 15:07, Christopher Hegarty -Sun Microsystems Ireland
wrote:
>
>
> Sean Mullan wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Security folk:
>>> Do we currently have any tests with a dependency on cacerts?
>>
>> yes, but they would be in the closed tests.
>
> So we have your own non public tests for t
Andrew John Hughes wrote:
This has been posted about before; OpenJDK currently can't bootstrap
itself because it doesn't have a working cacerts store (the JAXP URL
uses https).
I don't know how to solve this; we can certainly have the cacerts file
populated on GNU/Linux systems, but I don't hav
Sean Mullan wrote:
Security folk:
Do we currently have any tests with a dependency on cacerts?
yes, but they would be in the closed tests.
So we have your own non public tests for this. Maybe RedHat should take
a similar approach then.
-Chris.
--Sean
On 18 March 2010 14:57, Christopher Hegarty -Sun Microsystems Ireland
wrote:
> Pavel Tisnovsky wrote:
>>
>> Christopher Hegarty -Sun Microsystems Ireland wrote:
>>>
>>> Alan Bateman wrote:
Pavel Tisnovsky wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> please review new regression test for java.net.*
Christopher Hegarty -Sun Microsystems Ireland wrote:
Pavel Tisnovsky wrote:
Christopher Hegarty -Sun Microsystems Ireland wrote:
Alan Bateman wrote:
Pavel Tisnovsky wrote:
Hi,
please review new regression test for java.net.* API. This test
check if the cacerts keytool database is configured
Alan Bateman wrote:
Christopher Hegarty -Sun Microsystems Ireland wrote:
:
Alan is correct there are already tests for SSL/Https in javax.net,
but I believe these use self signed certs, no dependency on cacerts.
OK, in that case adding a new test make sense. The test/java/net tree is
probably
Pavel Tisnovsky wrote:
Christopher Hegarty -Sun Microsystems Ireland wrote:
Alan Bateman wrote:
Pavel Tisnovsky wrote:
Hi,
please review new regression test for java.net.* API. This test
check if the cacerts keytool database is configured properly and SSL
is really working. The test should
Christopher Hegarty -Sun Microsystems Ireland wrote:
Alan Bateman wrote:
Pavel Tisnovsky wrote:
Hi,
please review new regression test for java.net.* API. This test check
if the cacerts keytool database is configured properly and SSL is
really working. The test should not fail if SSL is worki
Christopher Hegarty -Sun Microsystems Ireland wrote:
:
Alan is correct there are already tests for SSL/Https in javax.net,
but I believe these use self signed certs, no dependency on cacerts.
OK, in that case adding a new test make sense. The test/java/net tree is
probably not the best place t
On 18 March 2010 14:28, Christopher Hegarty -Sun Microsystems Ireland
wrote:
> Alan Bateman wrote:
>>
>> Pavel Tisnovsky wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> please review new regression test for java.net.* API. This test check if
>>> the cacerts keytool database is configured properly and SSL is really
>>>
Alan Bateman wrote:
Pavel Tisnovsky wrote:
Hi,
please review new regression test for java.net.* API. This test check
if the cacerts keytool database is configured properly and SSL is
really working. The test should not fail if SSL is working (in other
case it simply throws IOException). Webr
Changeset: 2796f839e337
Author:weijun
Date: 2010-03-18 18:26 +0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/2796f839e337
6829283: HTTP/Negotiate: Autheticator triggered again when user cancels the
first one
Reviewed-by: chegar
!
src/share/classes/sun/net/www/protocol/http/
28 matches
Mail list logo
