Please find comments in line...
On 5/27/2015 3:42 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
Valerie,
Did you see my comment yesterday?
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/security-dev/2015-May/012254.html
Yes, we exchanged emails after this above one. I will follow up your
latest one later today.
On 05/22/2015 12:41 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
webrev:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8043758/webrev.latest/
Updates:
1. Update to discard invalid records, rather than use an alert message,
per the requirements in section 4.1.2.7, RFC 6374.
2. Update to use a base test class, simplify the test
Please find comments in line.
On 5/27/2015 4:40 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
On May 27, 2015, at 4:17 PM, Valerie Pengvalerie.p...@oracle.com wrote:
Hi, Mandy,
I have second thought on using the provider name for the java.security file...
There are a few things that I want to discuss/brainstorm
On 5/29/2015 4:17 AM, Sean Mullan wrote:
On 05/22/2015 12:41 PM, Xuelei Fan wrote:
webrev:http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~xuelei/8043758/webrev.latest/
Updates:
1. Update to discard invalid records, rather than use an alert message,
per the requirements in section 4.1.2.7, RFC 6374.
2. Update
On 27/05/15 21:35, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
How much of the montgomery multiply and sqaure are you planning to
intrinsify? Are you doing the whole thing or just portions of the
operations similar to multiplyToLen and squareToLen?
I'm doing the whole montgomery multiply and square operation in
On 05/28/2015 08:51 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 27/05/15 21:35, Anthony Scarpino wrote:
How much of the montgomery multiply and sqaure are you planning to
intrinsify? Are you doing the whole thing or just portions of the
operations similar to multiplyToLen and squareToLen?
I'm doing the
Please review the changes for JEP 166:
In this webrev, I have updated test certificate fields to reflect proper test
data.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~asmotrak/bhanu/8048830/webrev.01/
Thanks,
Bhanu
From: Bhanu Prakash Gopularam
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 8:43 PM
To:
