regards,
Goetz.
(Am I correct that your openJdk name is Vinnie?)
> -Original Message-
> From: Vincent Ryan [mailto:vincent.x.r...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 14:53
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenma...@sap.com>
> Cc: awt-...@openjdk.j
Hi,
I'd like to propose a row of smaller fixes where code is noted down a bit
questionable.
SAP's quality process requires that we fix these in our internal delivery, and I
Would like to share my fixes with openJdk. Some of these fixes are of more
theoretical nature as how I understand the code
Langer, Christoph
> Sent: Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 20:47
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenma...@sap.com>
> Cc: awt-...@openjdk.java.net; security-dev@openjdk.java.net; 2d-
> d...@openjdk.java.net; Vincent Ryan <vincent.x.r...@oracle.com>
> Subject: RE: RFR(M): 817052
Hi Vincent,
I fixed the typo and added a remark to the first line of the bug text.
Best regards,
Goetz.
> -Original Message-
> From: Vincent Ryan [mailto:vincent.x.r...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 17:10
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz <goetz.lindenma..
---
> From: Phil Race [mailto:philip.r...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 20:59
> To: Sergey Bylokhov <sergey.bylok...@oracle.com>; Lindenmaier, Goetz
> <goetz.lindenma...@sap.com>; Vincent Ryan <vincent.x.r...@oracle.com>
> Cc: awt-...@openjdk.java.n
rgey.bylok...@oracle.com>; Lindenmaier, Goetz
> <goetz.lindenma...@sap.com>; Vincent Ryan <vincent.x.r...@oracle.com>
> Cc: awt-...@openjdk.java.net; 2d-dev <2d-...@openjdk.java.net>; security-
> d...@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] RF
Ah, no, that is just the field that is initialized with the
Result of gtk3_get_color_for_flags() why I need to initialize it there.
Best regards,
Goetz.
> -Original Message-
> From: Lindenmaier, Goetz
> Sent: Donnerstag, 1. Dezember 2016 12:10
> To: 'Prasan
Hi,
I scanned all the changes we did to exception messages in our
internal VM, see below. We print paths and sockets in a row of places,
but also other information. It's wide spread, while most is in
java.base.
We plan to contribute these messages in the near future. Thus
it'll be useful if
well.
>
> If needed, we might use something similar to JDK-8207768 where a
> category has been added for enhanced exception messages to the
> java.security file .
>
> Best regards, Matthias
>
> From: Baesken, Matthias
> Sent: Dienstag, 9. Oktober 2018
Hi,
we have a user running into jdk-8209965.
The downport change has been opened in August, but
not yet been worked on.
Will this be downported to jdk11u? If this is not being worked
on by Oracle, I would request a downport. But I don't want
to interfere with your work.
Hi,
These tests lack @requires vm.hasJFR, thus they are failing on AIX.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr18/8215334-JFR_requires/01/
Please review.
I will push this to jdk12 as it is a testbug if I miss the RDP deadline.
Best regards,
Goetz.
Thanks Erik!
Pushed.
Best regards,
Goetz
> -Original Message-
> From: serviceability-dev On
> Behalf Of Erik Gahlin
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 12:34 PM
> To: security-dev@openjdk.java.net; serviceability-dev (serviceability-
> d...@openjdk.java.net)
> Subject: Re: 8215534:
prepared by Oracle
will not be released to the open.
These two pieces of information don't fit together in
my mind :)
Best regards,
Goetz.
> -Original Message-
> From: Lindenmaier, Goetz
> Sent: Freitag, 16. November 2018 15:07
> To: 'Xuelei Fan' ; 'Prasadrao Kopp
HI Rob,
thanks for the update! Seems it was accepted for 11.0.2 ...
So I don't need to take action.
Best regards,
Goetz.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob McKenna
> Sent: Mittwoch, 21. November 2018 17:35
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz
> Cc: security-dev@openjdk.java.ne
Hi Rajan,
are you working on this issue? We have this test disabled, I would like to run
it again.
Best regards,
Goetz.
> -Original Message-
> From: security-dev On Behalf Of
> Rajan Halade
> Sent: Mittwoch, 11. Juli 2018 17:42
> To: Baesken, Matthias ; security-
>
ecurity-
> d...@openjdk.java.net
> Cc: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; Sibabrata Sahoo
>
> Subject: Re: jdk11u and jdk/jdk : jtreg test error in
> security/infra/java/security/cert/CertPathValidator/certification/ActalisCA.ja
> va
>
> On 11/27/18 7:36 AM, Baesken, Matthias wrote:
> &
Hi Christoph,
it is a good idea to keep testing these two matters separately.
Could you please document in the new test that in OpenJDK
it is decided to keep this property empty?
Something like:
@comment In OpenJDK, this property is empty by default and on purpose. This
test assures the default
Thanks!
I should have stated that I don't need a new webrev, thanks anyways.
Best regards,
Goetz.
> -Original Message-
> From: Langer, Christoph
> Sent: Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2019 11:59
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; OpenJDK Dev list
> ; OpenJDK Network Dev list d...@o
Hi,
I would like to downport this for parity with 11.0.7-Oracle.
It does not apply clean because in 11 changes were applied in
a different order than in 14.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~goetz/wr19/8213010-certmgr.exe_keys-jdk11/
In ECUtil.java I had to resolve the Copyright.
patching file
Hi Christoph,
Thanks for reviewing!
Best regards,
Goetz.
> -Original Message-
> From: Langer, Christoph
> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2019 5:42 PM
> To: Lindenmaier, Goetz ; jdk-updates-
> d...@openjdk.java.net; OpenJDK Dev list
> Subject: RE: [11u] RFR: 821301
Hi Martin,
This looks good to me. The adaption makes sense.
Best regards,
Goetz.
From: security-dev On Behalf Of Doerr,
Martin
Sent: Dienstag, 18. Mai 2021 17:03
To: jdk-updates-...@openjdk.java.net; security-dev
Subject: [11u] RFR: 8266293: Key protection using PBEWithMD5AndDES fails
Hi Martin,
Thanks for downporting this.
Nice documentation of the changes! Looks good.
Best regards,
Goetz.
From: Doerr, Martin
Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 9:28 PM
To: security-dev ;
jdk-updates-...@openjdk.java.net
Cc: Langer, Christoph ; Lindenmaier, Goetz
Subject: [11u] RFR
22 matches
Mail list logo
