> Has the optional classes been verified to serialize/deserialize correctly?
>
They are not serializable.
> Finally, are these utilities critical to some other part JDK 8 that they were
> pushed out now as opposed to JDK 9?
>
>
They are part of the libraries being added by JSR-335 / Project L
Changeset: 5fa2fd782993
Author:briangoetz
Date: 2013-10-24 13:06 -0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/5fa2fd782993
8019646: Clarify javadoc contract of LambdaMetafactory
Reviewed-by: briangoetz, rfield
Contributed-by: dan.sm...@oracle.com
! src/share/classes/java/l
Changeset: 62a67e0875ff
Author:briangoetz
Date: 2013-10-30 14:12 -0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/62a67e0875ff
8024930: Re-enable disabled bridging tests
Reviewed-by: psandoz, rfield
! test/tools/javac/lambdaShapes/org/openjdk/tests/separate/Compiler.java
Changeset: ddb0b681654a
Author:briangoetz
Date: 2013-10-29 12:31 -0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/ddb0b681654a
8027318: Lambda Metafactory: generate serialization-hostile read/writeObject
methods for non-serializable lambdas
Reviewed-by: rfield, psandoz
! src/
Changeset: 9732816c9d17
Author:briangoetz
Date: 2013-10-29 12:45 -0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/9732816c9d17
8024633: Lambda linkage performance - initialize generated class earlier
Reviewed-by: briangoetz, rfield
Contributed-by: sergey.kukse...@oracle.com
!
Changeset: 82ee370c3d7e
Author:briangoetz
Date: 2013-10-31 10:37 -0400
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/82ee370c3d7e
8024637: Lambda linkage performance - use reflection instead of ASM to
manipulate parameter types
8023984: Lambda linkage performance - use a method r
Ineexof(char) sounds like as fast and simpler?
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 5, 2013, at 8:55 AM, Peter Levart wrote:
> On 11/04/2013 07:12 PM, robert.fi...@oracle.com wrote:
>> Changeset: 51b002381b35
>> Author:rfield
>> Date: 2013-11-04 10:12 -0800
>> URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.n
This is a common question. The short answer is "no".
The short explanation of "why not", is that if there's a conflict
between a superCLASS method and a superINTERFACE method, the class
method wins. Since Object is a class, the toString (or hashCode, or
equals) in Object will win over any de
I've noticed there's not much interest in improving Serialization on
these lists. This makes me wonder if java Serialization has lost
relevance in recent years with the rise of protocol buffers apache
thrift and other means of data transfer over byte streams.
I sense your frustration, but I thi
The NPE is at BytecodeDescriptor.parseSig#83, which says:
return loader.loadClass(name);
so the null ref seems likely to be loader. The loader is initially
passed in from BoundMethodHandle#817, which provides a null loader,
indicating that it wants the system loader. At th
Changeset: 25462d7eee24
Author:briangoetz
Date: 2011-02-02 13:13 -0500
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/tl/jdk/rev/25462d7eee24
7012540: java.util.Objects.nonNull() incorrectly named
Reviewed-by: darcy, weijun
! src/share/classes/java/io/PrintStream.java
! src/share/classes/jav
A significant fraction of the lambda candidates in the JDK are converted
to some form of PrivilegedAction. However, at least until there is a
significant performance advantage of lambda over inner classes, I think
it is probably not worth trying to convert these -- I think the
explicitness of
I'll just note that @FunctionalInterface is not *required* to convert a
lambda to the target type; it is a statement of *design intent* by the
interface author (which comes with some compile-time enforcement) that
the interface is intended to be used to specify a function-like thing.
On 2/6/2
This was received via the Java SE 10 umbrella JSR comments list; since
it relates to JEP 116, I am forwarding it here.
Forwarded Message
Subject: [JCP]JSR-383(Java SE 18.3) Public review - JEP 116:Extended
Validation SSL Certificates
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 10:33:41 +
Looks good! Glad to see the Amber features finding their way into the
codebase.
On 3/8/2021 1:53 PM, Patrick Concannon wrote:
Hi,
Could someone please review my code for updating the code in the `java.io`,
`java.math`, and `java.text` packages to make use of the `instanceof` pattern
variabl
On Tue, 25 May 2021 11:49:18 GMT, Tagir F. Valeev wrote:
>> Inspired by PR#4088. Most of the changes are done automatically using
>> IntelliJ IDEA refactoring. Some manual adjustments are also performed,
>> including indentations, moving comments, extracting common cast out of
>> switch expres
On Tue, 25 May 2021 11:49:18 GMT, Tagir F. Valeev wrote:
>> Inspired by PR#4088. Most of the changes are done automatically using
>> IntelliJ IDEA refactoring. Some manual adjustments are also performed,
>> including indentations, moving comments, extracting common cast out of
>> switch expres
17 matches
Mail list logo
