Re: Debian packaging, quick naming question

2006-05-25 Thread Russ Allbery
Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > BTW - Am really glad someone has picked up the debian thing. I had an > ITP filed for a long time, but I never got around to actually doing the > packaging. Did the ITP get closed, or is there still one floating around that I need to make sure I cat

RE: RC1 for 1.3.0 C++ Library

2006-05-25 Thread Scott Cantor
> I'll switch these around. I don't have access to a Sol 8 box, so it's > going to be tricky for me to replicate the probolem on that > system :<. It's not specific to 8, it should pop up on any box where openssl isn't in /usr/lib. -- Scott

Re: RC1 for 1.3.0 C++ Library

2006-05-25 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Scott Cantor wrote: > My initial attempt to configure the RC1 build on Solaris 8 (sparc) isn't > working...I'm getting an empty Makefile when I configure with the Sun > compiler. I think it's actually echoing the generated Makefile to stdout > instead of into the file. I'll try it some more, it mi

Re: Debian packaging, quick naming question

2006-05-25 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Scott Cantor wrote: >>Second, and this is one of those things that doesn't really matter but I >>promised to at least ask, there were a few Debian developers who responded >>to my Intent to Package notification who were wondering why the package >>was called XML-Security-C when it was written in C+