re is no way to tell the difference between significant
and non significant whitespace.
Else the canonicalization would remove non significant whitespace,
I would guess.
Just my 2 cent,
Heiner
Martin Ravell wrote:
> H, it may well be a misunderstanding on my part then.
>
> I had assu
vior are you seeing that seems inconsistent with the
specification?
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Ravell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 7:36 PM
> To: security-dev@xml.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Enveloped suggestions
>
> Just had a crack
processes. (I
tested removing some whitespace and wondered why it would not verify until I
took a closer look at the code).
So I guess I'm still interested in which of the Apache samples fits best
(and does canonicalization properly).
Regards
Marty
-Original Message-
From: Martin R
Thanks for the pointer Scott. I'll take another look at the reference
implementation.
I'm kind of interested in the Apache security stuff now and my question on
which of the samples to focus on still stands. Can you (or anyone out there
on the list) suggest a tutorial or even just which of the sam
Firstly, I'm brand new to this list (almost as new to the whole XMLDSIG
stuff) and if there is a more appropriate 'user's' list that I should be on
can someone please point me in the right direction?
I've pulled down the Apache security stuff today and am able to run the
tests and the mega-sample
