Re: IssuerDN issue

2007-11-29 Thread Marcel Ammerlaan
On Nov 29, 2007 5:23 AM, Tom Scavo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/28/07, Scott Cantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I saw some other issues regarding matching of the DN, but these were > > > related to the order of the > > > attributes. Is there any definitive workaround for this (apart f

Re: IssuerDN issue

2007-11-28 Thread Tom Scavo
On 11/28/07, Scott Cantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marcel Ammerlaan wrote: > > A second issue with interop testing I found is the issuer-name. In the > > test-certificate I use the state attribute is present. The .Net platform > > generates a message with the attribute 'ST=' whereas Java gener

Re: IssuerDN issue

2007-11-28 Thread Scott Cantor
Marcel Ammerlaan wrote: A second issue with interop testing I found is the issuer-name. In the test-certificate I use the state attribute is present. The .Net platform > generates a message with the attribute 'ST=' whereas Java generates 'S=' > (or the other way round. I don't have the messages

IssuerDN issue

2007-11-28 Thread Marcel Ammerlaan
Hi, A second issue with interop testing I found is the issuer-name. In the test-certificate I use the state attribute is present. The .Net platform generates a message with the attribute 'ST=' whereas Java generates 'S=' (or the other way round. I don't have the messages at hand right now). I saw