Re: RE: Encrypt with public key

TED]> Date: Monday, June 18, 2007 0:51 am Subject: RE: Encrypt with public key > Dear all > > Thanks for your responses. I understand the argument you have brought > forward. Indeed what I needed is to encrypt using the public key > of sender, > not sign. What I wo

RE: Encrypt with public key

h the private key of a sender as you mentioned in the last post... You encrypt with the *public* key of the *receiver*. Cheers, Ulrich -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: security-dev@xml.apache.org Gesendet: 18.06.07 10:03:15 An: Betreff: RE: Encrypt with public key Dear all Thanks for

RE: Encrypt with public key

: security-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: RE: Encrypt with public key Hi Thomas, this is exactly what I was stating in a previous post to Joseph: "Why do you want to SIGN a document with a PUBLIC key? I have never heard of anything like that. There is no authenticy involved when signing with a p

RE: Encrypt with public key

rs, Ulrich -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: security-dev@xml.apache.org Gesendet: 14.06.07 13:52:54 An: Betreff: RE: Encrypt with public key Hi Ulrich, You wrote: > 1. Create a RSAPrivateKeySpec object with the following (the exponents can be retrieved by any > object implementing the RSAPub

RE: Encrypt with public key

Hi Ulrich, You wrote: > 1. Create a RSAPrivateKeySpec object with the following (the exponents can be retrieved by any > object implementing the RSAPublicKey interface): RSAPrivateKeySpec(BigInteger modulus, BigInteger > privateExponent) 2. Create a KeyFactory: KeyFactory.getInstance("RSA") 3. G

RE: Encrypt with public key

apache.org Gesendet: 12.06.07 07:54:19 An: Betreff: RE: Encrypt with public key Hi Ulrich! Thanks for your time to answer my query. My problem is not so much with using the APIs. In fact I have successfully sent encrypted and signed messages between two communicators. However, my problem lies here

Re: Encrypt with public key

Joseph Bonello wrote: My problem is that I ALSO want to sign the document with the PUBLIC key of the other person. However, when I try to change localPrivateKey to a Public Key, I get an exception that it needs a PrivateKey. Is it possible to work it out that way? That's just not how a digita

RE: Encrypt with public key

work right now, I do not have the time to figure that out. I'll take a look at that this evening. Cheers, Ulrich -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: security-dev@xml.apache.org Gesendet: 12.06.07 07:54:19 An: Betreff: RE: Encrypt with public key Hi Ulrich! Thanks for your time to

RE: Encrypt with public key

Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: security-dev@xml.apache.org Gesendet: 06.06.07 08:41:36 An: Betreff: RE: Encrypt with public key Dear Ulrich Thanks for your response and the advice. I am using Bouncy Castle as my security provider. Is there some code that I can use as an example for what I need? Th

RE: Encrypt with public key

Gesendet: 06.06.07 08:41:36 An: Betreff: RE: Encrypt with public key Dear Ulrich Thanks for your response and the advice. I am using Bouncy Castle as my security provider. Is there some code that I can use as an example for what I need? The public key is stored in a public key object in a

RE: Encrypt with public key

Joseph -Original Message- From: Ulrich Ackermann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 June 2007 22:50 To: security-dev@xml.apache.org Subject: Re: Encrypt with public key Hi Joseph, Sure is this possible. That's what Apache XML Security is all about, isn't it? :) But I would firs

Re: Encrypt with public key

Hi Joseph, Sure is this possible. That's what Apache XML Security is all about, isn't it? :) But I would first sign the message and encrypt it afterwards. That gives a hacker less information because all signature related information is in the encrypted part of the receipt. Cheers, Ulrich ---