> If you don't use xpath transformations everything is a lot faster(If you
> use it, you get a moderate speed-up). But the best thing is that know
> that the engineSign is significative, the Scott's native JCE
> implementation improves the think a lot(x4 times) (Thanks Scott).
> Right now in my te
Scott Cantor wrote:
is it possible that this version signs seven times faster
that the 1.04 ???
because, I just replaced the old jars an obtained those times.
My test was about 3 times faster, but depending on the test case, I wouldn't
be surprised. 1.1 is a huge improvement thanks to those
> is it possible that this version signs seven times faster
> that the 1.04 ???
> because, I just replaced the old jars an obtained those times.
My test was about 3 times faster, but depending on the test case, I wouldn't
be surprised. 1.1 is a huge improvement thanks to those last minute patches
thanks. that was my problem. Should we have a Validator that checks which algo's in
the config
file is actually available on the system?
thanks,
dims
--- Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dims,
>
> Do you have the strong crypto policy files installed in your JRE?
>
> Cheers,
>
Dims,
Do you have the strong crypto policy files installed in your JRE?
Cheers,
Berin
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Here's the junit report - http://nagoya.apache.org/~dims/xmlsec-junit/
-- dims
--- Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Berin,
I have trouble running "ant -f build-ant
Here's the junit report - http://nagoya.apache.org/~dims/xmlsec-junit/
-- dims
--- Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Berin,
>
> I have trouble running "ant -f build-ant1.5.xml" straight from latest cvs...Am
> getting test
> failures. see enclosed out.txt.
>
> -- dims
>
>
>
> ---
Berin,
I have trouble running "ant -f build-ant1.5.xml" straight from latest cvs...Am getting
test
failures. see enclosed out.txt.
-- dims
--- Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peoples,
>
> I have just made 1.1 "official". It's on the web, with updated docs.
>
> I'll also try t
