Hello Raul,
I have build CVS version and it works fine. My results are:
using 1.1: 901ms
using cvs: 320ms
Three times faster than 1.1 and three times faster than IBM XML Security
Suite according to my tests.
Thanks Raul!!!
Regards,
Egor Pervuninski
egor {dot} pervuninski {at} gmail {dot} com
Raul
At least, fixed!
It was driving me mad. I was thinking of saying: OK, I have do test
with hundreds of XML files, and the 1.2 approach was speedier than
the 1.1 approach, but your test is clear and we need to throw all the
1.2 version and begin with the 1.1 and tar myself, and wea
Hello Raul,
I am using Microsoft Windows 2000 Professional 5.00.2195 with
ServicePack 4 and "Russian" locale.
I have Celeron 1200MHz machine with 512Mb RAM.
I have tried to run java with -server option using two different JREs
but results were the same.
Here is the output of java -version for
Hi Egor,
First of all sorry for not answering your request sooner. Regarding
your problem, it seems that the way we transform the stream to UTF8 in
1.2(the library do the conversion itself) is slower in your case to
the way it was done 1.1(we use classes given by the SDK). This is
weird because
Hello,
Sure, here it is.
## Davanum Srinivas : Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:28:24 -0500
DS> Can you please post your test.xml as well? thanks, dims
DS>
DS> On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:31:18 +0500, Egor Pervuninski
DS> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Recently I tried to upgrade my project to use
Can you please post your test.xml as well?
thanks,
dims
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:31:18 +0500, Egor Pervuninski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Recently I tried to upgrade my project to use new Apache XML Security 1.2 for
> Java
> and found that now the library does c14n much MUCH more sl
