RE: Exclusive canonicalization problem

2005-02-10 Thread Cédric POTHIN
évrier 2005 10:14 > À : security-dev@xml.apache.org > Objet : Re: Exclusive canonicalization problem > > Of course, You must use setAttributeNS always don't ever use a DOM > call without the suffixs NS. (In my humble opinion they must burried > the DOM api for this ;) ). >

Re: Exclusive canonicalization problem

2005-02-10 Thread Raul Benito
sh"); > > Do I have to create it using setAttributeNS()? > > The parser is the latest xerces version. > Thks in advance > Regards > > Cédric > > > -Message d'origine- > > De : Raul Benito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Envoyé : jeudi 10 fév

RE: Exclusive canonicalization problem

2005-02-10 Thread Cédric POTHIN
AttributeNS()? The parser is the latest xerces version. Thks in advance Regards Cédric > -Message d'origine- > De : Raul Benito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : jeudi 10 février 2005 07:29 > À : security-dev@xml.apache.org > Objet : Re: Exclusive canonicalizat

Re: Exclusive canonicalization problem

2005-02-09 Thread Raul Benito
Hi Cedric, Your case is very strange indeed. I use this kind of c14n and I've never found a problem(and is a very common case so more people and the test cases will also fail). So I thinking that perhaps the DOM parser to blame, so: which java version and in which OS are you using? Which DOM par