Re: X509Data vs CertificateValues

2009-05-19 Thread -Fab-
> That way when validating you would know exactly what to expect and what >> to >> do. >> Now this is only my feeling and I'm still quite new to digital >> signatures, >> so may be >> I've missed some points. >> >> Is there something I didn't understand in the specifications? Are my >> interpretations >> correct? >> >> What should I do in my implementation? >> >> Regards, >> >> Fab >> >> PS:I'm using JSR 105 with JDK 1.5 > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/X509Data-vs-CertificateValues-tp23593392p23611720.html Sent from the Apache XML - Security - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: X509Data vs CertificateValues

2009-05-18 Thread Sean Mullan
Have you asked any of the folks who worked on Xades? They should be better able to explain the motivation behind the design. --Sean -Fab- wrote: Hello, I've tried to find the answer to my question using the search feature, but was unsuccessful. If it is already answered, please feel free to j

X509Data vs CertificateValues

2009-05-18 Thread -Fab-
in my implementation? Regards, Fab PS:I'm using JSR 105 with JDK 1.5 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/X509Data-vs-CertificateValues-tp23593392p23593392.html Sent from the Apache XML - Security - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.