Berin Lautenbach wrote:
Hey all,
Raul suggested recently that we do a 1.2 release of the Java library.
I think that's a great idea - there are a lot of fixes and
improvements that have been done that would make good sense.
I'd also like to do a release of the C library - I have a fairly
functi
Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
Raul suggested recently that we do a 1.2 release of the
Java library. I think that's a great idea - there are a lot of fixes
and
improvements that have been done that would make good sense.
That would be great!
For now, I distribute a library that I did b
Raul wrote:
> It seems that
> the patch slows the test a little(<5%) I don't know how big
> the impact
> is when using in real world examples(I don't think it will be
> too much,
> but if anyone can post his own results we can check for sure).
> It will be great if it can be test as wild as po
> By the way, it would nice ass you are releasing a new version if you
> were to adopt the convention of putting the release version in the Jar
> names.
> ie xml-security-1.1.0.jar is much better than xmlsec.jar
+1
We do this manually with xmlsec and Xerces when checking them into our cvs.
-- Sc
