This is the response I received on the BC dev mailing list regarding the
oaep-padding issue that I mentioned in my previous email (See thread
with subject - "[java] config.xml and JCA/JCE provider issues").
Vishal
--- Begin Message ---
Thanks for the notification. I note the document also speci
The CVS HEAD version of xml-security causes a StringIndexOutOfBoundsException in
InclusiveNamespaces.java.
Find attached a suggested fix to the InclusiveNamespaces.prefixStr2Set method. The fix
simply reverts a breaking change in r1.6 of
InclusiveNamespaces.java.
Petteri
Index: src/org/apache
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 2 p
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 2 p
Monica,
Can you remind me - is 2.1 with the old DOM_Node interface? (Nodes were
not pointers, they were objects with reference counts - a kind of Java
approach in C++).
If so, the released versions won't support it. (OpenSSL 0.9.6 should be
fine.) Early beta code supported 2.1, but you'd nee
Petteri Stenius wrote:
The CVS HEAD version of xml-security causes a StringIndexOutOfBoundsException in
InclusiveNamespaces.java.
Find attached a suggested fix to the InclusiveNamespaces.prefixStr2Set method. The fix
simply reverts a breaking change in r1.6 of
InclusiveNamespaces.java.
Petteri
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
- Yes I just checked it in.
Took me a while to find - I'm not too sure why, but the behaviour of
the canoncicaliser appears to have changed.
It appears that the canonicaliser is now storing it's output. So if
you re-use an instance, it will append the new canonicalisati
Ok. Here's the stacktrace.
Petteri
-Original Message-
From: Raul Benito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 2:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: InclusiveNamespaces and StringIndexOutOfBoundsException
Petteri Stenius wrote:
>The CVS HEAD version of xml-secu
we can easily add the two lines to a static block...let's go for it.
-- dims
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 12:41:53 +0530, Vishal Mahajan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is the response I received on the BC dev mailing list regarding the
> oaep-padding issue that I mentioned in my previous email (See th
Petteri Stenius wrote:
Ok. Here's the stacktrace.
java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: -4
at java.lang.String.substring(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.String.substring(Unknown Source)
at org.a
Monica,
when xsec 1.0.0 was released, the actual version of xerces was 2.2 or 2.3,
if I remember correctly. Digging in my memories, I think it should also
work with 2.1 (... long time gone since then... :-) )
Which errors do you get?
I wouldn't recommend to use older versions of xsec, since 1.0 wa
Raul Benito wrote:
Berin Lautenbach wrote:
- Yes I just checked it in.
Took me a while to find - I'm not too sure why, but the behaviour of
the canoncicaliser appears to have changed.
It appears that the canonicaliser is now storing it's output. So if
you re-use an instance, it will append the
Hi,
I checked the Xerces C++ migration archive, and the DOM reorganization happened in Xerces 2.0.0. Snippet from archive: "The old Java-like DOM is now deprecated, and all the associated files, including the headers and DOMParser files are moved to src/xercesc/dom/deprecated. Users of the old J
I would like to hear what other members on the list think about going
for this change.
Vishal
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Vishal,
+1 from me.
thanks,
dims
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 04:40:46 +, Vishal Mahajan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All:
Based on Sean's proposal I have prepared a patch (attached)
> I would like to hear what other members on the list think about going
> for this change.
I'm strongly in favor of it. We've been sort of fighting this mechanism and
having trouble with helping people that have unusual JCE requirements.
If I understand the change correctly, it will let people u
15 matches
Mail list logo