Re: 1.3 C++ library timeline?

2006-02-19 Thread Berin Lautenbach
Actually I've been thinking of doing it reasonably soon (although my definition of "reasonably soon" always seems to be rather a long way out :>). I'm in the process of wrapping up the XKMS message code for XKRS messages and then I want to cut a release. Particularly given some of the optimis

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project xml-security (in module xml-security) failed

2006-02-19 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project xml-security (in module xml-security) failed

2006-02-19 Thread Sam Ruby
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project xml-security has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project xml-security (in module xml-security) failed

2006-02-19 Thread Raul Benito
It seems that gump don't like junit.swingui fix it. Let see if now compiles. Regards, On 2/19/06, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To whom it may engage... > > This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For > more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, >

RE: 1.3 C++ library timeline?

2006-02-19 Thread Scott Cantor
> Given that's the case - is there anything special you need, or is it > already in the repo? I haven't done a detailed look-over, although the main thing I was working on was whether I needed to continue handling my own algorithm URIs or not. That's in the trunk now, so it sounds like I can skip